Sampson Lipton

633 total citations
36 papers, 376 citations indexed

About

Sampson Lipton is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sampson Lipton has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 376 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Surgery, 11 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and 10 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Sampson Lipton's work include Pain Management and Opioid Use (8 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (8 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (7 papers). Sampson Lipton is often cited by papers focused on Pain Management and Opioid Use (8 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (8 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (7 papers). Sampson Lipton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Sampson Lipton's co-authors include John Miles, David Bowsher, Juan José Lahuerta, N. E. Williams, Michael Conway, John J. Miles, Michael A. Hayward, J. D. Acland, John B. Miles and L. J. Hipkin and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Pain and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Sampson Lipton

32 papers receiving 327 citations

Peers

Sampson Lipton
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 163
  • Physiology 132
  • Surgery 113
  • Pharmacology 98
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 53
Replace P.M. Finch with:
P.M. Finch Australia
W. Klement Germany
DE Moulin Canada
Clemente Muriel Spain
C Conseiller France
Cousins Mj Australia
Jan Maeyaert Belgium
Sessle Bj Canada
John Eisenhoffer Canada
Allan R. Molloy Australia
P.M. Finch Australia View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Sampson Lipton
Sampson Lipton · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Sampson Lipton
Sampson Lipton · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Sampson Lipton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sampson Lipton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sampson Lipton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sampson Lipton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sampson Lipton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sampson Lipton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sampson Lipton. The network helps show where Sampson Lipton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sampson Lipton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sampson Lipton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sampson Lipton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sampson Lipton. Sampson Lipton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1
Pain mechanisms and management.
11
2 12
3 2
4
Percutaneous cervical cordotomy: results and complications in a recent series of 100 patients.
29
5 3
6
Intractable pain--the present position.
3
7 1
8
Relief of pain in clinical practice
13
9 11
10 34
11 7
12 35
13
Persistent Pain: Modern Methods of Treatment
25
14 6
15 3
16 2
17 2
18 4
19 1
20 11

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026