N. E. Williams

873 citations
41 papers · 547 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

N. E. Williams

38 papers receiving 486 citations

Peers

N. E. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 187
  • Pharmacology 84
  • Pharmaceutical Science 30
  • Developmental Neuroscience 18
  • Pharmacology 38
Replace T.N. Calvey with:
T.N. Calvey United Kingdom
J. A. Jansen Denmark
George D. Olsen United States
Ronald R. Tuttle United States
Marie‐Odile Richard France
D. Arndts Germany
Martin Helrich United States
J. A. Watt Australia
Scott R. Hamann United States
R. G. Moore Australia
N. E. Williams relative to T.N. Calvey United Kingdom T.N. Calvey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
T.N. Calvey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. E. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. E. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. E. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. E. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. E. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. E. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. E. Williams. The network helps show where N. E. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. E. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. E. Williams Line = papers co-authored together N. E. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197658
2 198557
3 200852
4 198038
5 197436
6 197835
7 199523
8 198822
9 198319
10 197616
11 197816
12 196816
13 198116
14 199915
15 199714
16 198313
17 197513
18 199711
19
Pain relief and pituitary function following injection of alcohol into the pituitary fossa.
19809
20
Pain and Its Management
19838

About N. E. Williams

N. E. Williams is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 41 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (14 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (11 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (7 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (4 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (4 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers) and Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (187 citations), Pharmacology (84 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (30 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (18 citations) and Pharmacology (38 citations). N. E. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include T.N. Calvey, Kelvin Y.K. Chan, G. R. Murray, J. D. Baty, Priyanka Mishra, Serge Duckett, Sampson Lipton, M. D. D. Bell, John J. Miles and K.C. Allen Chan. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Anaesthesia, The Lancet and International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact