Sam‐Po Law

1.9k total citations
90 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Sam‐Po Law is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sam‐Po Law has authored 90 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 64 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 57 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 24 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sam‐Po Law's work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (55 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (41 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (22 papers). Sam‐Po Law is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (55 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (41 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (22 papers). Sam‐Po Law collaborates with scholars based in Hong Kong, United States and China. Sam‐Po Law's co-authors include Anthony Pak‐Hin Kong, Yen Na Yum, Man‐Tak Leung, Brendan Weekes, Antoon Lerut, Carolyn E. Reed, Mark S. Allen, K. Kesler, Thomas J. Watson and Thomas W. Rice and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and Biological Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Sam‐Po Law

88 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Sam‐Po Law
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 799
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 705
  • Surgery 261
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 246
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 230
Replace Tara L. Whitehill with:
Tara L. Whitehill Hong Kong
Heather Harris Wright United States
Susan J. Rickard Liow Singapore
Insup Taylor Canada
Manwa L. Ng Hong Kong
Katherine S. Binder United States
Rachel Wu United States
Guoli Yan China
Justin C. Wise United States
Michiru Makuuchi Japan
Tara L. Whitehill Hong Kong View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Sam‐Po Law
Sam‐Po Law · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Sam‐Po Law
Sam‐Po Law · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Sam‐Po Law

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sam‐Po Law's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam‐Po Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam‐Po Law more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sam‐Po Law

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam‐Po Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam‐Po Law. The network helps show where Sam‐Po Law may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sam‐Po Law

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sam‐Po Law. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sam‐Po Law based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sam‐Po Law. Sam‐Po Law is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 4
2 3
3 21
4 3
5 15
6 3
7 14
8 31
9 8
10 33
11 20
12 2
13 14
14 29
15 11
16 266
17 22
18 8
19
Structural representations of characters in chinese writing: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia
41
20 41

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026