Sam Woolford

444 total citations
11 papers, 275 citations indexed

About

Sam Woolford is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Media Technology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Sam Woolford has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 275 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Epidemiology, 2 papers in Media Technology and 2 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Sam Woolford's work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (2 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (1 paper). Sam Woolford is often cited by papers focused on BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (2 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (1 paper). Sam Woolford collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Türkiye. Sam Woolford's co-authors include Dominique Haughton, Colleen M. McBride, Elizabeth C. Clipp, Karen M. Emmons, Elaine Puleo, Kathryn I. Pollak, Sherrill L. Sellers, Vence L. Bonham, Abdolreza Eshghi and Michael Sumner and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, The American Statistician and BMC Health Services Research.

In The Last Decade

Sam Woolford

11 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sam Woolford United States 7 50 46 35 31 30 11 275
Dhruv Sharma United States 12 62 1.2× 90 2.0× 44 1.3× 55 1.8× 39 1.3× 43 382
Natalie King United Kingdom 13 76 1.5× 44 1.0× 13 0.4× 44 1.4× 8 0.3× 34 410
Deborah J. Clark United States 11 79 1.6× 41 0.9× 23 0.7× 27 0.9× 13 0.4× 21 490
Lynne Doner Lotenberg United States 8 44 0.9× 48 1.0× 12 0.3× 64 2.1× 27 0.9× 19 223
Mohammed Hassanien Saudi Arabia 13 17 0.3× 117 2.5× 29 0.8× 37 1.2× 33 1.1× 41 456
Chaohua Li United States 13 17 0.3× 28 0.6× 37 1.1× 68 2.2× 38 1.3× 37 365
Rachel Cusatis United States 11 28 0.6× 52 1.1× 52 1.5× 69 2.2× 5 0.2× 34 358
Kathy Lynch Australia 11 70 1.4× 36 0.8× 102 2.9× 136 4.4× 10 0.3× 34 461
Melissa M. Goldstein United States 11 38 0.8× 84 1.8× 11 0.3× 85 2.7× 17 0.6× 27 283
James G. Burrow United States 8 51 1.0× 44 1.0× 23 0.7× 55 1.8× 14 0.5× 15 312

Countries citing papers authored by Sam Woolford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sam Woolford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam Woolford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Woolford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sam Woolford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam Woolford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam Woolford. The network helps show where Sam Woolford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sam Woolford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sam Woolford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sam Woolford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sam Woolford. Sam Woolford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Eshghi, Abdolreza, et al.. (2021). Identifying Groups: A Comparison of Methodologies. Journal of Data Science. 9(2). 271–291. 11 indexed citations
2.
Sparks, Ross, Bella Robinson, Robert Power, Mark Cameron, & Sam Woolford. (2016). An investigation into social media syndromic monitoring. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation. 46(8). 5901–5923. 8 indexed citations
3.
Bonham, Vence L., Sherrill L. Sellers, & Sam Woolford. (2014). Physicians’ knowledge, beliefs, and use of race and human genetic variation: new measures and insights. BMC Health Services Research. 14(1). 456–456. 30 indexed citations
4.
Jenkins, Jean, Sam Woolford, Nancy Stevens, Norman B. Kahn, & Colleen M. McBride. (2014). The Adoption of Genomic-Related Innovations by Family Physicians. 3(2). 70–78. 6 indexed citations
5.
Haughton, Dominique, et al.. (2011). Enrolment Management in Graduate Business Programs: Predicting Student Retention. 16(2). 63–79. 1 indexed citations
6.
Woolford, Sam, et al.. (2010). The Business of Desire and Fear. The American Statistician. 64(1). 21–22. 3 indexed citations
7.
Haughton, Dominique, et al.. (2009). Review of Three Latent Class Cluster Analysis Packages: Latent Gold, poLCA, and MCLUST. The American Statistician. 63(1). 81–91. 100 indexed citations
8.
Woolford, Sam. (2009). A quality assessment tool for improvement planning. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management. 4(5/6). 644–644. 3 indexed citations
10.
McBride, Colleen M., Elaine Puleo, Kathryn I. Pollak, et al.. (2007). Understanding the role of cancer worry in creating a “teachable moment” for multiple risk factor reduction. Social Science & Medicine. 66(3). 790–800. 84 indexed citations
11.
Deichmann, Joel I., Abdolreza Eshghi, Dominique Haughton, Sam Woolford, & Selin Sayek. (2007). Measuring the international digital divide: an application of Kohonen self-organising maps. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning. 3(6). 552–552. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026