Sam Desiere
Impact in
-
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
-
- Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Papers in
-
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices 4
- Agricultural Economics and Policy 3
-
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality 5
- Co-authors
- Marijke D’Haese (16 shared papers)Dean Jolliffe (3 shared papers)Wytse Vellema (9 shared papers)Giel Ton (6 shared papers)Md Kamrul Hasan (1 shared paper)Lalit Kumar (1 shared paper)Ludo Struyven (3 shared papers)Wim Verbeke (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Food and Nutrition Bulletin (2 papers)EuroChoices (1 paper)Food Security (1 paper)Campbell Systematic Reviews (1 paper)Foods (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Sam Desiere
29 papers receiving 874 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 357
- Business and International Management 68
- Soil Science 199
- Safety Research 60
- Economics and Econometrics 179
Countries citing papers authored by Sam Desiere
This map shows the geographic impact of Sam Desiere's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam Desiere with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Desiere more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sam Desiere
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam Desiere. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam Desiere. The network helps show where Sam Desiere may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Sam Desiere, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 163 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 156 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 112 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 54 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 45 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 43 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 42 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 41 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 7 |
About Sam Desiere
Sam Desiere is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Soil Science and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 33 papers that have together received 922 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural risk and resilience (5 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (4 papers), Land Rights and Reforms (4 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (3 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (3 papers) and Agricultural Economics and Policy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (357 citations), Business and International Management (68 citations), Soil Science (199 citations), Safety Research (60 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (179 citations). Sam Desiere has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marijke D’Haese, Dean Jolliffe, Wytse Vellema, Giel Ton, Md Kamrul Hasan, Lalit Kumar, Ludo Struyven, Wim Verbeke, Yung Hung and Monique Ramioul. Their work appears in journals such as Food and Nutrition Bulletin, EuroChoices, Food Security, Campbell Systematic Reviews and Foods.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.