Sai Ding

1.2k total citations
20 papers, 770 citations indexed

About

Sai Ding is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management and Accounting. According to data from OpenAlex, Sai Ding has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 770 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 7 papers in Strategy and Management and 7 papers in Accounting. Recurrent topics in Sai Ding's work include Economic Growth and Productivity (7 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (7 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (6 papers). Sai Ding is often cited by papers focused on Economic Growth and Productivity (7 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (7 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (6 papers). Sai Ding collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Malaysia. Sai Ding's co-authors include John Knight, Alessandra Guariglia, Xiao Zhang, John Knight, Richard Harris, Puyang Sun, Minjoo Kim, Yanzhong Wang, Shang‐Jin Wei and Junhong Yang and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Banking & Finance, European Economic Review and Journal of Corporate Finance.

In The Last Decade

Sai Ding

20 papers receiving 724 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sai Ding United Kingdom	11	412	370	181	152	137	20	770
Walter Steingress France	10	266 0.6×	243 0.7×	138 0.8×	180 1.2×	143 1.0×	16	578
Markus Leibrecht Austria	15	490 1.2×	260 0.7×	290 1.6×	295 1.9×	53 0.4×	58	823
Mauricio Larraín United States	11	429 1.0×	363 1.0×	104 0.6×	110 0.7×	324 2.4×	25	739
Matías Braun Chile	13	499 1.2×	411 1.1×	197 1.1×	351 2.3×	455 3.3×	38	998
Jacques Morisset United States	14	279 0.7×	147 0.4×	249 1.4×	227 1.5×	67 0.5×	37	634
Benn Steil United Kingdom	12	235 0.6×	201 0.5×	130 0.7×	95 0.6×	290 2.1×	35	629
Shandre M. Thangavelu Singapore	14	441 1.1×	94 0.3×	255 1.4×	370 2.4×	127 0.9×	59	755
Junyi Xiang China	9	263 0.6×	240 0.6×	101 0.6×	48 0.3×	85 0.6×	13	477
Reid W. Click United States	12	392 1.0×	219 0.6×	178 1.0×	310 2.0×	313 2.3×	18	687
Susan Chun Zhu United States	12	643 1.6×	208 0.6×	374 2.1×	689 4.5×	155 1.1×	30	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Sai Ding

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sai Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sai Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sai Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sai Ding

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sai Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sai Ding. The network helps show where Sai Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sai Ding

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sai Ding. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sai Ding based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sai Ding. Sai Ding is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Ma, Qing-Bo, et al.. (2025). Green Finance and Corporate Green Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review. SAGE Open. 15(3). 1 indexed citations

Ding, Sai, et al.. (2025). The Impact of Cash Flow Uncertainty on Investment‐Cash Flow Sensitivity in China: The Debt Financing Channel. International Journal of Finance & Economics. 30(4). 3986–4003. 1 indexed citations

Ding, Sai, Wei Jiang, Shengyu Li, & Shang‐Jin Wei. (2024). Fiscal policy volatility and capital misallocation: Evidence from China. European Economic Review. 167. 104797–104797. 6 indexed citations

Wang, Yanzhong & Sai Ding. (2022). Social and Economic Stimulating Development Strategies for China’s Ethnic Minority Areas. 3 indexed citations

Ding, Sai, Alessandra Guariglia, John Knight, & Junhong Yang. (2019). Negative Investment in China: Financing Constraints and Restructuring versus Growth. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 69(4). 1411–1449. 8 indexed citations

Ding, Sai, et al.. (2018). The Effect of Foreign Entry Regulation on Downstream Productivity: Microeconomic Evidence from China*. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 121(3). 925–959. 7 indexed citations

Ding, Sai, Minjoo Kim, & Xiao Zhang. (2018). Do firms care about investment opportunities? Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance. 52. 214–237. 42 indexed citations

Ding, Sai, John Knight, & Xiao Zhang. (2016). Does China overinvest? Evidence from a panel of Chinese firms. European Journal of Finance. 25(6). 489–507. 74 indexed citations

Ding, Sai, et al.. (2016). Import competition, dynamic resource allocation and productivity dispersion: micro-level evidence from China. Oxford Economic Papers. 68(4). 994–1015. 12 indexed citations

10.

Harris, Richard, Nigar Hashimzade, & Sai Ding. (2016). Political Connections, State Ownership and Productivity in China. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

11.

Ding, Sai, et al.. (2015). The Effect of Import Competition on Firm Productivity and Innovation: Does the Distance to Technology Frontier Matter?. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 78(2). 197–227. 24 indexed citations

12.

Ding, Sai, Alessandra Guariglia, & Richard Harris. (2015). The determinants of productivity in Chinese large and medium-sized industrial firms, 1998–2007. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 45(2). 131–155. 53 indexed citations

13.

Ding, Sai, Alessandra Guariglia, & John Knight. (2012). Investment and financing constraints in China: Does working capital management make a difference?. Journal of Banking & Finance. 37(5). 1490–1507. 281 indexed citations

14.

Ding, Sai, Alessandra Guariglia, & John Knight. (2012). Negative Investment in China: Financing Constraints and Restructuring Versus Growth. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations

15.

Knight, John & Sai Ding. (2012). China's Remarkable Economic Growth. Oxford University Press eBooks. 47 indexed citations

16.

Ding, Sai, et al.. (2012). An assessment of agricultural productivity and major driving factors in the republic of Benin. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management. 5(4). 5 indexed citations

17.

Ding, Sai, Alessandra Guariglia, & John Knight. (2011). Investment and Financing Constraints in China: Does Working Capital Management Make a Difference?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 22 indexed citations

18.

Knight, John & Sai Ding. (2010). Why Does China Invest So Much?. Asian Economic Papers. 9(3). 87–117. 31 indexed citations

19.

Ding, Sai & John Knight. (2010). Why has China Grown So Fast? The Role of Physical and Human Capital Formation*. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 73(2). 141–174. 83 indexed citations

20.

Ding, Sai & John Knight. (2009). Can the augmented Solow model explain China’s remarkable economic growth? A cross-country panel data analysis. Journal of Comparative Economics. 37(3). 432–452. 62 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact