Journal of Comparative Economics

2.2k papers and 65.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Journal of Comparative Economics in the last decades have received a total of 65.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Comparative Economics usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.1k papers), Sociology and Political Science (511 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (426 papers) specifically the topics of Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (274 papers), Global trade and economics (213 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (194 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Comparative Economics are Pak Hung Mo, Sylvie Démurger, Saul Estrin, Jan Tinbergen, Louis Putterman, Xiaobo Zhang, Simeon Djankov, Xin Meng, Daron Acemoğlu and Chong‐En Bai.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Comparative Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Comparative Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Comparative Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Comparative Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Comparative Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Comparative Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Comparative Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025