S. Sherman

816 citations
8 papers · 632 indexed · h-index 4

S. Sherman

8 papers receiving 622 citations

Peers

S. Sherman
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Developmental Neuroscience 286
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 224
  • Ophthalmology 101
  • Genetics 104
  • Molecular Biology 416
Replace Karen Lai with:
Karen Lai United States
Louise A. Mesentier‐Louro United States
Xing Zhao United States
Chantal Mazerolle Canada
M. A. Aleksandrova Russia
Myung Soo Cho South Korea
Masatoshi Haruta Japan
Jian-Min Luo China
Konstantin Feinberg United States
Shweta Singhal United Kingdom
S. Sherman relative to Karen Lai United States Karen Lai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Karen Lai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. Sherman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Sherman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Sherman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Sherman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Sherman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Sherman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Sherman. The network helps show where S. Sherman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. Sherman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. Sherman Line = papers co-authored together S. Sherman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
Design Considerations and Performance of a Next-Generation Encapsulated Cell Technology Intraocular Implant Delivering VEGF-Antagonist
20142
2
Continuous Intraocular Drug Delivery over 5 ½ Years: Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor (CNTF)Production by Encapsulated Cell Technology Implants Treating Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa and Geographic Atrophy
20132
3
Long-Term, Sustained Intraocular Delivery of a VEGF Antagonist Using Encapsulated Cell Technology Implant for the Treatment of Choroidal Neovascular Diseases
20121
4 2012139
5
Sustained Intraocular Delivery of a Receptor Antibody Using an Encapsulated Cell Technology Implant
20101
6 200465
7 1999403
8 199819

About S. Sherman

S. Sherman is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Developmental Neuroscience and Ophthalmology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 632 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (2 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1 paper) and Corneal Surgery and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (286 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (224 citations) and Ophthalmology (101 citations). S. Sherman has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Cui Xia, Lars U. Wahlberg, Zhongyi Hu, Åke Seiger, Jennifer Jackson, Melissa K. Carpenter, Konrad Kauper, Weng Tao, Paul Stabila and Alice Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Neurology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Tissue Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026