S. Scopel

3.8k total citations
84 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

S. Scopel is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, S. Scopel has authored 84 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 81 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 49 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 9 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in S. Scopel's work include Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (74 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (67 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (46 papers). S. Scopel is often cited by papers focused on Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (74 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (67 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (46 papers). S. Scopel collaborates with scholars based in South Korea, Italy and Spain. S. Scopel's co-authors include N. Fornengo, A. Bottino, Fiorenza Donato, P. Belli, R. Cerulli, Eung Jin Chun, G. Mignola, R. Bernabei, L. Pieri and Jong-Chul Park and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Physics Letters B and Computer Physics Communications.

In The Last Decade

S. Scopel

82 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S. Scopel South Korea 28 2.4k 1.5k 319 50 29 84 2.4k
Céline Bœhm France 21 2.1k 0.9× 1.6k 1.1× 245 0.8× 42 0.8× 51 1.8× 55 2.3k
Felix Kahlhoefer Germany 27 2.2k 0.9× 1.4k 0.9× 308 1.0× 20 0.4× 66 2.3× 63 2.3k
Josef Pradler Austria 25 2.2k 0.9× 1.4k 1.0× 409 1.3× 35 0.7× 50 1.7× 57 2.3k
Gordan Krnjaic United States 29 2.6k 1.1× 1.4k 1.0× 411 1.3× 48 1.0× 86 3.0× 65 2.8k
Asher Berlin United States 25 1.9k 0.8× 1.3k 0.9× 204 0.6× 23 0.5× 61 2.1× 67 2.1k
D. Horns Germany 20 1.4k 0.6× 1.1k 0.7× 204 0.6× 11 0.2× 31 1.1× 85 1.6k
Francesco Vissani Italy 33 3.4k 1.4× 683 0.5× 66 0.2× 50 1.0× 59 2.0× 106 3.5k
Anson Hook United States 18 1.2k 0.5× 894 0.6× 246 0.8× 11 0.2× 34 1.2× 59 1.4k
Samuel D. McDermott United States 23 1.9k 0.8× 1.5k 1.0× 247 0.8× 15 0.3× 74 2.6× 39 2.1k
Eric Kuflik United States 22 1.8k 0.8× 1.0k 0.7× 231 0.7× 20 0.4× 56 1.9× 44 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by S. Scopel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Scopel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Scopel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Scopel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Scopel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Scopel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Scopel. The network helps show where S. Scopel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Scopel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Scopel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Scopel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. Scopel. S. Scopel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Scopel, S., et al.. (2025). Low-mass constraints on WIMP effective models of inelastic scattering using the Migdal effect. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2025(1). 35–35. 3 indexed citations
2.
Choi, K., et al.. (2025). Sensitivity of WIMP bounds on the velocity distribution in the limit of a massless mediator. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2025(1). 7–7. 1 indexed citations
3.
Biswas, Anirban, Bum-Hoon Lee, Wonwoo Lee, et al.. (2024). Gauss-Bonnet Cosmology: large-temperature behaviour and bounds from Gravitational Waves. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2024(9). 7–7. 2 indexed citations
4.
Kim, Hyomin, et al.. (2024). WIMP constraints from black hole low-mass X-ray binaries. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2024(3). 30–30.
5.
Scopel, S., et al.. (2023). Halo-independent bounds on Inelastic Dark Matter. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2023(11). 77–77. 4 indexed citations
6.
Scopel, S., et al.. (2023). Bracketing the direct detection exclusion plot for a WIMP of spin one half in non-relativistic effective theory. Astroparticle Physics. 151. 102854–102854. 1 indexed citations
7.
Scopel, S., et al.. (2023). Halo-independent bounds on the non-relativistic effective theory of WIMP-nucleon scattering from direct detection and neutrino observations. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2023(3). 11–11. 7 indexed citations
8.
Ibarra, Alejandro, et al.. (2022). Complementarity of experiments in probing the non-relativistic effective theory of dark matter-nucleon interactions. arXiv (Cornell University). 8 indexed citations
9.
Tomar, Gaurav, et al.. (2020). Is a WIMP explanation of the DAMA modulation effect still viable?. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 1468. 12015–12015.
10.
Scopel, S., et al.. (2017). From direct detection to relic abundance: the case of proton-philic spin-dependent inelastic Dark Matter. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2017(4). 31–31. 4 indexed citations
11.
Scopel, S., et al.. (2016). Inelastic dark matter with spin-dependent couplings to protons and large modulation fractions in DAMA. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2016(2). 50–50. 9 indexed citations
12.
Scopel, S., N. Fornengo, & A. Bottino. (2013). Embedding the 125 GeV Higgs boson measured at the LHC in an effective MSSM: Possible implications for neutralino dark matter. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 88(2). 20 indexed citations
13.
Belli, P., R. Bernabei, A. Bottino, et al.. (2011). Observations of annual modulation in direct detection of relic particles and light neutralinos. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 84(5). 95 indexed citations
14.
Chun, Eung Jin & S. Scopel. (2008). Quintessential kination and leptogenesis. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 120(2). 22008–22008. 1 indexed citations
15.
Bottino, A., Fiorenza Donato, N. Fornengo, & S. Scopel. (2008). Interpreting the recent results on direct searches for dark matter particles in terms of relic neutralinos. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 78(8). 97 indexed citations
16.
Chun, Eung Jin & S. Scopel. (2007). Analysis of leptogenesis in a supersymmetric triplet seesaw model. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 75(2). 15 indexed citations
17.
Chun, Eung Jin & S. Scopel. (2006). Soft leptogenesis in Higgs triplet model. Physics Letters B. 636(5). 278–285. 21 indexed citations
18.
Fornengo, N., Antonio Riotto, & S. Scopel. (2003). Supersymmetric dark matter and the reheating temperature of the universe. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 67(2). 62 indexed citations
19.
Bottino, A., G. Fiorentini, N. Fornengo, et al.. (2002). Does solar physics provide constraints to weakly interacting massive particles?. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 66(5). 40 indexed citations
20.
Bottino, A., V. de Alfaro, N. Fornengo, et al.. (1992). DIRECT VERSUS INDIRECT SEARCHES FOR NEUTRALINO DARK MATTER. Modern Physics Letters A. 7(9). 733–747. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Céline Bœhm Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Felix Kahlhoefer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Josef Pradler Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gordan Krnjaic Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Asher Berlin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by D. Horns Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Francesco Vissani Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anson Hook Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Samuel D. McDermott Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eric Kuflik
Rankless by CCL
2026