Céline Bœhm

4.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
55 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Céline Bœhm is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Céline Bœhm has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 43 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 4 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Céline Bœhm's work include Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (41 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (26 papers) and Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (18 papers). Céline Bœhm is often cited by papers focused on Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (41 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (26 papers) and Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (18 papers). Céline Bœhm collaborates with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Australia. Céline Bœhm's co-authors include P. Fayet, Joseph Silk, R. Schaeffer, Dan Hooper, Michel Cassé, Jacques Paul, Aaron C. Vincent, Ryan Wilkinson, T. A. Enßlin and Yann Mambrini and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Reviews of Modern Physics and Nuclear Physics B.

In The Last Decade

Céline Bœhm

51 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

Scalar dark matter candidates 2004 2026 2011 2018 2004 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Céline Bœhm France 21 2.1k 1.6k 245 51 42 55 2.3k
Josef Pradler Austria 25 2.2k 1.0× 1.4k 0.9× 409 1.7× 50 1.0× 35 0.8× 57 2.3k
Eduard Massó Spain 30 2.5k 1.2× 979 0.6× 317 1.3× 93 1.8× 13 0.3× 91 2.6k
Gordan Krnjaic United States 29 2.6k 1.2× 1.4k 0.9× 411 1.7× 86 1.7× 48 1.1× 65 2.8k
Adam Foster United States 13 700 0.3× 937 0.6× 185 0.8× 17 0.3× 74 1.8× 46 1.2k
Maurizio Giannotti United States 25 1.9k 0.9× 1.3k 0.8× 239 1.0× 31 0.6× 7 0.2× 66 2.1k
Dmitry Gorbunov Russia 30 2.9k 1.3× 2.0k 1.3× 114 0.5× 163 3.2× 11 0.3× 140 3.1k
S. Gninenko Russia 23 1.5k 0.7× 413 0.3× 263 1.1× 20 0.4× 68 1.6× 71 1.6k
Pierre Salati France 30 2.8k 1.3× 2.0k 1.3× 206 0.8× 84 1.6× 40 1.0× 72 2.9k
L. Baudis Switzerland 25 2.2k 1.0× 928 0.6× 486 2.0× 36 0.7× 205 4.9× 84 2.3k
David McKeen Canada 28 1.9k 0.9× 891 0.6× 355 1.4× 35 0.7× 24 0.6× 56 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Céline Bœhm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Céline Bœhm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Céline Bœhm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Céline Bœhm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Céline Bœhm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Céline Bœhm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Céline Bœhm. The network helps show where Céline Bœhm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Céline Bœhm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Céline Bœhm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Céline Bœhm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Céline Bœhm. Céline Bœhm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Croton, Darren J., et al.. (2024). Using dust to constrain dark matter models. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 534(3). 2622–2632.
2.
Bœhm, Céline. (2024). Particle dark matter versus modified gravity. Nuclear Physics B. 1003. 116503–116503. 1 indexed citations
3.
Bœhm, Céline, D. Eckert, Mathilde Jauzac, et al.. (2024). A full reconstruction of two galaxy clusters intra-cluster medium with strong gravitational lensing. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 528(2). 1711–1736.
4.
Sharma, Sanjib, Joss Bland‐Hawthorn, Joseph Silk, & Céline Bœhm. (2023). Can radial motions in the stellar halo constrain the rate of change of mass in the Galaxy?. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 521(3). 4074–4084. 2 indexed citations
5.
Jauzac, Mathilde, David Lagattuta, Guillaume Mahler, et al.. (2023). Joint HST, VLT/MUSE, and XMM−Newton observations to constrain the mass distribution of the two strong lensing galaxy clusters: MACS J0242.5-2132 and MACS J0949.8+1708. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 522(1). 1118–1137. 5 indexed citations
6.
Bœhm, Céline, et al.. (2023). A mixed-methods study exploring women’s perceptions and recommendations for a pregnancy app with monitoring tools. npj Digital Medicine. 6(1). 50–50. 11 indexed citations
7.
Jenkins, A. C., et al.. (2023). Gravitational-wave event rates as a new probe for dark matter microphysics. Physical review. D. 108(4). 6 indexed citations
8.
Bœhm, Céline, et al.. (2023). Probing dark matter interactions with 21cm observations. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2023(3). 47–47. 9 indexed citations
9.
Bœhm, Céline, et al.. (2021). Scalar dark matter candidates revisited. Physical review. D. 103(7). 16 indexed citations
10.
Shao, Michael, Slava G. Turyshev, Chengxing Zhai, et al.. (2019). Finding Exo-Earths with Precision Space Astrometry. Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology). 51(3). 74. 2 indexed citations
11.
Wertz, O., Daniel Stern, A. Krone-Martins, et al.. (2019). Gaia GraL: Gaia DR2 gravitational lens systems. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 628. A17–A17. 3 indexed citations
12.
Siegert, Thomas, R. Diehl, Aaron C. Vincent, et al.. (2016). Search for 511 keV emission in satellite galaxies of the Milky Way with INTEGRAL/SPI. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 595. A25–A25. 27 indexed citations
13.
Malbet, F., Alain Léger, G. Anglada‐Escudé, et al.. (2016). Microarcsecond astrometric observatory Theia: from dark matter to compact objects and nearby earths. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9904. 99042F–99042F. 8 indexed citations
14.
Bœhm, Céline, Timur Delahaye, & Joseph Silk. (2010). Can the Morphology ofγ-Ray Emission Distinguish Annihilating from Decaying Dark Matter?. Physical Review Letters. 105(22). 221301–221301. 8 indexed citations
15.
Bœhm, Céline & R. Schaeffer. (2005). Constraints on Dark Matter interactions from structure formation: damping lengths. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 438(2). 419–442. 103 indexed citations
16.
Bœhm, Céline, Dan Hooper, Joseph Silk, Michel Cassé, & Jacques Paul. (2004). MeV Dark Matter: Has It Been Detected?. Physical Review Letters. 92(10). 101301–101301. 312 indexed citations
17.
Bœhm, Céline & P. Fayet. (2004). Scalar dark matter candidates. Nuclear Physics B. 683(1-2). 219–263. 426 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Hooper, Dan, Francesc Ferrer, Céline Bœhm, et al.. (2004). Possible Evidence for MeV Dark Matter in Dwarf Spheroidals. Physical Review Letters. 93(16). 161302–161302. 53 indexed citations
19.
Hooper, Dan, Francesc Ferrer, Céline Bœhm, et al.. (2003). MeV Dark Matter In Dwarf Spheroidals: A Smoking Gun?. arXiv (Cornell University). 6 indexed citations
20.
Bœhm, Céline, T. A. Enßlin, & Joseph Silk. (2002). Are light annihilating Dark Matter particles possible. arXiv (Cornell University). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026