S. Peter Cowe
- Co-authors
- Howard I. AronsonDirk KrausmüllerSimon DixonAnthony O’MahonyPaschalis M. KitromilidesDonald CrummeySharon E. J. GerstelElizabeth Zachariadou
- Topics
- Byzantine Studies and History (8 papers)Eurasian Exchange Networks (6 papers)Historical and Linguistic Studies (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Oriental SocietyThe Journal of Theological StudiesCambridge University Press eBooks
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
S. Peter Cowe
8 papers receiving 23 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 16
- Sociology and Political Science 13
- Classics 12
- Language and Linguistics 10
- History 6
- Anthropology 5
Countries citing papers authored by S. Peter Cowe
This map shows the geographic impact of S. Peter Cowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Peter Cowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Peter Cowe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by S. Peter Cowe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Peter Cowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Peter Cowe. The network helps show where S. Peter Cowe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Peter Cowe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Peter Cowe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Peter Cowe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. Peter Cowe. S. Peter Cowe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | The Geography of Ananias of Širak , the Long and the Short Recensions: Introduction, Translation and CommentaryThe Geography of Ananias of Sirak , the Long and the Short Recensions: Introduction, Translation and Commentary | 1 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Mxit'ar Sasnec'i's theological discourses | 1 |
| 9 | An Armenian Job fragment from Sinai and its implications: (mit 2 Abb.) | 1 |
| 10 | The Armenian Version of Daniel | 5 |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 1 |
About S. Peter Cowe
S. Peter Cowe is a scholar working on Classics, Religious studies and Anthropology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 34 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Byzantine Studies and History (8 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (6 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (12 citations), Linguistics and Language (5 citations) and Religious studies (5 citations). S. Peter Cowe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Howard I. Aronson, Dirk Krausmüller, Simon Dixon, Anthony O’Mahony, Paschalis M. Kitromilides, Donald Crummey, Sharon E. J. Gerstel, Elizabeth Zachariadou, Lindsey Hughes and Nancy P. Ševčenko. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Oriental Society, The Journal of Theological Studies and Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.