S Lenzen

491 citations
16 papers · 408 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Pancreatic function and diabetes 13
    • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 6
    • Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer 4
    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 2

S Lenzen

15 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

S Lenzen
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 138
  • Surgery 232
  • Genetics 109
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 24
  • Molecular Biology 214
Replace Alexander Balhuizen with:
Alexander Balhuizen Sweden
Glyn M. Noguchi United States
N. Sekine Japan
Erik C. Joly Canada
Albert Jochen United States
Johanna Westerlund Sweden
Joshua C. Neuman United States
Joan Helmering United States
Suad Efendic Sweden
V. D’Aleo Italy
S Lenzen relative to Alexander Balhuizen Sweden Alexander Balhuizen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Alexander Balhuizen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S Lenzen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S Lenzen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S Lenzen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S Lenzen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S Lenzen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S Lenzen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S Lenzen. The network helps show where S Lenzen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside S Lenzen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S Lenzen Line = papers co-authored together S Lenzen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1984129
2 198858
3 201142
4 199824
5 201219
6 199818
7 201218
8 200417
9 200817
10 200816
11 200916
12 201410
13 200210
14 20129
15 19904
16 20111

About S Lenzen

S Lenzen is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Genetics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (13 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (6 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (4 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (2 papers) and Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (138 citations), Surgery (232 citations), Genetics (109 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (24 citations) and Molecular Biology (214 citations). S Lenzen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Clifford J. Bailey, Ortwin Naujok, U. Panten, Peter M. Jones, Chris Burns, Anne Jörns, Flavio Francini, Matthias Elsner, Markus Tiedge and Ewa Gurgul-Convey. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Pharmacology, Molecular Therapy, Biochemical Society Transactions, Endocrine Reviews and Cell Proliferation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact