S. L. Gai
- Computational Mechanics top 1%
- Aerospace Engineering top 2%
- Applied Mathematics top 1%
- Environmental Engineering top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Andrew NeelyN. R. MudfordS. G. MallinsonSean O’ByrneGaetano M. D. CurraoDavid ButtsworthH. KleineGisu Park
- Topics
- Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (71 papers)Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (68 papers)Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (61 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaIndiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
S. L. Gai
103 papers receiving 934 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Computational Mechanics 859
- Aerospace Engineering 552
- Applied Mathematics 457
- Environmental Engineering 80
- Biomedical Engineering 71
Countries citing papers authored by S. L. Gai
This map shows the geographic impact of S. L. Gai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. L. Gai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. L. Gai more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by S. L. Gai
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. L. Gai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. L. Gai. The network helps show where S. L. Gai may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. L. Gai
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. L. Gai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. L. Gai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. L. Gai. S. L. Gai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | SHOCK-WAVE BOUNDARY-LAYER INTERACTION WITH SUCTION | 0 |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | Heat transfer and flow behind a rearward facing step in a super-orbital expansion tube | 3 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Effects of suction on the interaction between shock wave and boundary layer at a compression corner | 5 |
About S. L. Gai
S. L. Gai is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Computational Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 110 papers that have together received 987 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (71 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (68 papers) and Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (61 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (457 citations), Computational Mechanics (859 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (552 citations). S. L. Gai has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Neely, N. R. Mudford, S. G. Mallinson, Sean O’Byrne, Gaetano M. D. Currao, David Buttsworth, H. Kleine, Gisu Park, James N. Moss and A. F. P. Houwing. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Journal of Computational Physics and The Journal of Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.