Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A synthetic view on structure and evolution of the Milky Way
20031.1k citationsA. C. Robin, C. Reylé et al.Astronomy and Astrophysicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of S. Derriére's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Derriére with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Derriére more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Derriére. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Derriére. The network helps show where S. Derriére may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Derriére
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Derriére.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Derriére based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with S. Derriére. S. Derriére is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pineau, F.‐X., et al.. (2020). The CDS Cross-match Service: Key Figures, Internals and Future Plans. 522. 125.1 indexed citations
4.
Criscienzo, M. Di, E. Merlin, M. Castellano, et al.. (2017). The ASTRODEEP Frontier Fields catalogues. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 607. A30–A30.21 indexed citations
Lesteven, S., C. Bonnin, S. Derriére, et al.. (2010). DJIN: Detection in Journals of Identifiers and Names. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).
10.
Derriére, S. & T. Boch. (2010). `SAMP'ling Your Browser for the Semantic Web. 434. 159.2 indexed citations
11.
Pineau, F.‐X., S. Derriére, Laurent Michel, C. Motch, & Coryn A. L. Bailer‐Jones. (2008). Statistical identification of 2XMMi sources. AIP conference proceedings. 15–21.1 indexed citations
12.
Lesteven, S., S. Derriére, F. Genova, et al.. (2007). Ontologies for Astronomy. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 377(1). 193–6.1 indexed citations
13.
Allen, Matthew R., F. Genova, S. Derriére, et al.. (2006). Proceedings of Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXII.1 indexed citations
14.
Derriére, S., et al.. (2006). UCDs and Ontologies. 351. 449.4 indexed citations
Richards, A. M. S., P. J. Diamond, A. Bayo, et al.. (2005). Hunting post-AGB/RSG objects using Virtual Observatories and other internet-based technology.. Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana. 76. 467.1 indexed citations
17.
Derriére, S., Norman Gray, Jonathan McDowell, et al.. (2004). UCD in the IVOA context. 314. 315.4 indexed citations
Robin, A. C., C. Reylé, S. Derriére, & Serge Picaud. (2003). A synthetic view on structure and evolution of the Milky Way. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 409(2). 523–540.1125 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Allen, M., F. Genova, F. Ochsenbein, et al.. (2003). Toward an AVO Interoperability Prototype. 295. 55.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.