Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Manyfold Increase in Sister Chromatid Exchanges in Bloom's Syndrome Lymphocytes
1974783 citationsR. S. K. Chaganti, S. A. Schonberg et al.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesprofile →
Citations per year, relative to S. A. Schonberg S. A. Schonberg (= 1×)
peers
Heinz-Ulrich Weier
Countries citing papers authored by S. A. Schonberg
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of S. A. Schonberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. A. Schonberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. A. Schonberg more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. A. Schonberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. A. Schonberg. The network helps show where S. A. Schonberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. A. Schonberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. A. Schonberg.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. A. Schonberg based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with S. A. Schonberg. S. A. Schonberg is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Eggerding, Faye A., S. A. Schonberg, FF Chehab, et al.. (1994). Uniparental isodisomy for paternal 7p and maternal 7q in a child with growth retardation.. PubMed. 55(2). 253–65.62 indexed citations
2.
Schonberg, S. A.. (1993). Cytogenetic analysis in prenatal diagnosis.. PubMed. 159(3). 360–5.5 indexed citations
Korenberg, Julie R., Hiroko Kawashima, Stefan M. Pulst, et al.. (1990). Molecular definition of a region of chromosome 21 that causes features of the Down syndrome phenotype.. PubMed. 47(2). 236–46.194 indexed citations
Trask, Barbara J., et al.. (1988). Application of flow karyotyping in prenatal detection of chromosome aberrations.. PubMed. 42(1). 49–59.25 indexed citations
Overhauser, Joan, Mitchell S. Golbus, S. A. Schonberg, & John J. Wasmuth. (1986). Molecular analysis of an unbalanced deletion of the short arm of chromosome 5 that produces no phenotype.. PubMed. 39(1). 1–10.54 indexed citations
Schonberg, S. A., M. F. Niermeijer, D. Bootsma, Edward D. Henderson, & J German. (1984). Werner's syndrome: proliferation in vitro of clones of cells bearing chromosome translocations.. PubMed. 36(2). 387–97.40 indexed citations
12.
Lau, Yun‐Fai Chris & S. A. Schonberg. (1984). A male-specific DNA probe detects heterochromatin sequences in a familial Yq- chromosome.. PubMed. 36(6). 1394–6.21 indexed citations
13.
German, J, S. A. Schonberg, E. Louie, & R. S. K. Chaganti. (1977). Bloom's syndrome. IV. Sister-chromatid exchanges in lymphocytes.. PubMed. 29(3). 248–55.125 indexed citations
14.
Chaganti, R. S. K., S. A. Schonberg, & James German. (1974). A Manyfold Increase in Sister Chromatid Exchanges in Bloom's Syndrome Lymphocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 71(11). 4508–4512.783 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.