Ryan R Reuter

690 total citations
49 papers, 478 citations indexed

About

Ryan R Reuter is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics and Animal Science and Zoology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ryan R Reuter has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 478 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 14 papers in Genetics and 13 papers in Animal Science and Zoology. Recurrent topics in Ryan R Reuter's work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (26 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (13 papers) and Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (8 papers). Ryan R Reuter is often cited by papers focused on Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (26 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (13 papers) and Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (8 papers). Ryan R Reuter collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and India. Ryan R Reuter's co-authors include Corey A. Moffet, G. W. Horn, Matthew R Beck, S. A. Gunter, Greg D. Williams, Jon T. Biermacher, Sara E Place, Twain J. Butler, H Kellner and U Schiemann and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment.

In The Last Decade

Ryan R Reuter

43 papers receiving 448 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ryan R Reuter United States 14 234 120 110 98 61 49 478
P. Creighton Ireland 15 292 1.2× 180 1.5× 92 0.8× 129 1.3× 76 1.2× 33 491
A. Geoghegan Ireland 8 161 0.7× 111 0.9× 118 1.1× 98 1.0× 118 1.9× 13 375
Darrin L Boss United States 11 259 1.1× 156 1.3× 110 1.0× 104 1.1× 66 1.1× 46 476
Steven I. Paisley United States 15 347 1.5× 191 1.6× 126 1.1× 70 0.7× 58 1.0× 30 639
Andrew Toovey Australia 9 312 1.3× 66 0.6× 64 0.6× 133 1.4× 57 0.9× 14 512
Manuel Sánchez‐Rodríguez Spain 9 119 0.5× 144 1.2× 89 0.8× 81 0.8× 48 0.8× 14 511
Bruce McCorkell Australia 10 279 1.2× 187 1.6× 110 1.0× 154 1.6× 31 0.5× 17 492
Matthew R Beck United States 13 372 1.6× 125 1.0× 161 1.5× 158 1.6× 41 0.7× 69 519
H. Archimède Guadeloupe 8 231 1.0× 73 0.6× 112 1.0× 133 1.4× 69 1.1× 9 384
R. A. Moss New Zealand 10 170 0.7× 84 0.7× 52 0.5× 57 0.6× 72 1.2× 34 339

Countries citing papers authored by Ryan R Reuter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ryan R Reuter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ryan R Reuter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ryan R Reuter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ryan R Reuter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ryan R Reuter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ryan R Reuter. The network helps show where Ryan R Reuter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ryan R Reuter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ryan R Reuter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ryan R Reuter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ryan R Reuter. Ryan R Reuter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wagner, Kevin, et al.. (2025). Use of virtual fencing to implement critical conservation practices. Rangelands. 47(1). 41–49. 3 indexed citations
2.
Wagner, Kevin, et al.. (2025). Virtual fences are not more stressful than conventional electric fences in rotationally stocked beef cattle. Rangelands. 47(1). 61–71. 3 indexed citations
3.
Hoag, Dana L., Ryan R Reuter, Daniel F. Mooney, et al.. (2025). The economic fundamentals of virtual fencing compared to traditional fencing. Rangelands. 47(1). 92–101. 5 indexed citations
5.
Beck, Matthew R, et al.. (2024). Recommendations on visit duration and sample number requirements for an automated head chamber system. Journal of Animal Science. 102. 7 indexed citations
6.
Horn, G. W., Ryan R Reuter, D. Brian Arnall, et al.. (2023). Replacing Fertilizer with Dried Distillers’ Grains in Stocker Cattle Systems on Southern Great Plains Old World Bluestem, USA. Animals. 13(18). 2904–2904. 1 indexed citations
7.
Beck, Matthew R, et al.. (2022). Effect of vitamin D source and dietary cation–anion difference in peripartum dairy cows on calcium homeostasis and milk production. Translational Animal Science. 6(1). txac010–txac010. 3 indexed citations
8.
Paudel, Shishir, Adam B. Cobb, Elizabeth H. Boughton, et al.. (2021). A framework for sustainable management of ecosystem services and disservices in perennial grassland agroecosystems. Ecosphere. 12(11). 25 indexed citations
9.
Reuter, Ryan R, et al.. (2021). 5 Effects of Virtual Fencing on Cortisol Concentrations and Behavior of Beef Cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 99(Supplement_3). 1–2. 6 indexed citations
10.
Reuter, Ryan R, et al.. (2020). 63 Effects of forage allowance and supplementation on performance of steers grazing wheat pasture. Journal of Animal Science. 98(Supplement_2). 10–11. 1 indexed citations
11.
Goad, Carla, et al.. (2019). 6 The effect of competition for an automated supplement feeder on supplement intake behavior of stocker steers. Journal of Animal Science. 97(Supplement_1). 15–15. 1 indexed citations
12.
Beck, Matthew R, et al.. (2019). Fat supplements differing in physical form improve performance but divergently influence methane emissions of grazing beef cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 254. 114210–114210. 21 indexed citations
13.
Williams, Greg D., et al.. (2018). Variability in supplement intake affects performance of beef steers grazing dormant tallgrass prairie. The Professional Animal Scientist. 34(4). 364–371. 14 indexed citations
14.
Reuter, Ryan R. (2017). Using Gamification to Teach Livestock Management Skills. Journal of Extension. 55(5). 1 indexed citations
15.
Williams, Greg D., et al.. (2016). 033 Effect of Supplementation Method on Protein Supplement Intake and Performance of Individual Beef Steers Grazing Native Range. Journal of Animal Science. 95(suppl_1). 16–16.
16.
Reuter, Ryan R, et al.. (2016). 027 Milk Production Responses to Beef Cow Energy Intakes. Journal of Animal Science. 95(suppl_1). 13–14. 2 indexed citations
17.
Reuter, Ryan R, et al.. (2016). 059 Distiller's grains as a substitute for fertilizer in summer grazing systems: performance, nitrogen recovery, and profit. Journal of Animal Science. 94(suppl_1). 29–29. 1 indexed citations
18.
Biermacher, Jon T., Ryan R Reuter, Maru K. Kering, et al.. (2012). Expected Economic Potential of Substituting Legumes for Nitrogen in Bermudagrass Pastures. Crop Science. 52(4). 1923–1930. 28 indexed citations
19.
Islam, M. Anowarul, Jon T. Biermacher, Sindy M. Interrante, et al.. (2011). Production and Economics of Grazing Rye–Annual Ryegrass and Tall Fescue Systems. Agronomy Journal. 103(2). 558–564. 29 indexed citations
20.
Purvis, H. T., et al.. (2001). Performance of light vs heavy steers grazing Plains Old World bluestem at three stocking rates.. Journal of Animal Science. 79(2). 493–493. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026