Sarah Lancaster

492 total citations
36 papers, 371 citations indexed

About

Sarah Lancaster is a scholar working on Plant Science, Pollution and Soil Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Lancaster has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 371 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Plant Science, 7 papers in Pollution and 7 papers in Soil Science. Recurrent topics in Sarah Lancaster's work include Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (18 papers), Soybean genetics and cultivation (9 papers) and Peanut Plant Research Studies (7 papers). Sarah Lancaster is often cited by papers focused on Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (18 papers), Soybean genetics and cultivation (9 papers) and Peanut Plant Research Studies (7 papers). Sarah Lancaster collaborates with scholars based in United States. Sarah Lancaster's co-authors include Scott A. Senseman, Terry J. Gentry, Emily B. Hollister, David L. Jordan, Lisa Milne, Alan C. York, David W. Monks, John W. Wilcut, P. Dewayne Johnson and Rick Brandenburg and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Agronomy Journal.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Lancaster

33 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Lancaster United States 11 271 167 60 39 36 36 371
L. Scarponi Italy 12 149 0.5× 138 0.8× 122 2.0× 21 0.5× 15 0.4× 29 316
Md. Najmol Hoque Bangladesh 8 278 1.0× 37 0.2× 43 0.7× 33 0.8× 22 0.6× 31 412
Di Long Netherlands 10 250 0.9× 33 0.2× 21 0.3× 14 0.4× 38 1.1× 16 434
Afsana Hannan Bangladesh 8 269 1.0× 32 0.2× 30 0.5× 18 0.5× 22 0.6× 17 348
Richard A. Wesley United States 13 272 1.0× 32 0.2× 144 2.4× 169 4.3× 36 1.0× 39 451
Jill Schroeder United States 15 489 1.8× 152 0.9× 24 0.4× 105 2.7× 6 0.2× 49 571
Gökhan Hacisalihoglu United States 17 854 3.2× 73 0.4× 219 3.6× 69 1.8× 2 0.1× 33 1.0k
Anne-Helen Harding United Kingdom 11 105 0.4× 66 0.4× 13 0.2× 10 0.3× 17 0.5× 18 315
Guiwei Wang China 7 158 0.6× 35 0.2× 73 1.2× 20 0.5× 3 0.1× 15 277
Stephen T. Lewis United States 6 138 0.5× 132 0.8× 11 0.2× 2 0.1× 19 0.5× 16 327

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Lancaster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Lancaster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Lancaster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Lancaster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Lancaster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Lancaster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Lancaster. The network helps show where Sarah Lancaster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Lancaster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Lancaster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Lancaster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Lancaster. Sarah Lancaster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wallace, John M., Nicholas J. Arneson, William G. Johnson, et al.. (2024). Planting soybean green: how cereal rye biomass and preemergence herbicides impact Amaranthus spp. management and soybean yield. Weed Science. 72(5). 615–629.
2.
Currie, R. S., P. W. Geier, Sarah Lancaster, & Christina Weber. (2023). Weed Control With ImiFlex in Igrowth Forage Sorghum. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports. 9(4). 1 indexed citations
3.
Arneson, Nicholas J., John M. Wallace, Karla L. Gage, et al.. (2023). Impact of cereal rye cover crop on the fate of preemergence herbicides flumioxazin and pyroxasulfone and control of Amaranthus spp. in soybean. Weed Science. 71(5). 493–505. 4 indexed citations
4.
Horn, G. W., Ryan R Reuter, D. Brian Arnall, et al.. (2023). Replacing Fertilizer with Dried Distillers’ Grains in Stocker Cattle Systems on Southern Great Plains Old World Bluestem, USA. Animals. 13(18). 2904–2904. 1 indexed citations
5.
Lancaster, Sarah, et al.. (2022). Use of open-source object detection algorithms to detect Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in soybean. Weed Science. 70(6). 648–662. 10 indexed citations
6.
Lancaster, Sarah, et al.. (2022). Non‐dicamba‐resistant soybean response to multiple dicamba applications. Agronomy Journal. 115(1). 147–160. 2 indexed citations
7.
8.
Norwood, F. Bailey, Michelle S. Calvo-Lorenzo, Sarah Lancaster, & P.A. Oltenacu. (2015). Agricultural and Food Controversies. Oxford University Press eBooks. 4 indexed citations
9.
Sellers, Brent A., et al.. (2013). Identification and Control of Coral Ardisia (Ardisia crenata): A Potentially Poisonous Plant.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2013(10).
10.
Jordan, David L., et al.. (2012). Influence of Application Variables on Efficacy of Manganese-Containing Fertilizers Applied to Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Peanut Science. 39(1). 1–8. 4 indexed citations
11.
Lancaster, Sarah, Emily B. Hollister, Scott A. Senseman, & Terry J. Gentry. (2009). Effects of repeated glyphosate applications on soil microbial community composition and the mineralization of glyphosate. Pest Management Science. 66(1). 59–64. 109 indexed citations
12.
Jordan, David L., et al.. (2009). Weed Management in Peanut with Herbicide Combinations Containing Imazapic and Other Pesticides. Weed Technology. 23(1). 6–10. 12 indexed citations
13.
Jordan, David L., et al.. (2008). Peanut (Arachis Hypogaea L.) Cultivar Response to Prohexadione Calcium. Peanut Science. 35(2). 101–107. 5 indexed citations
14.
Lancaster, Sarah, Scott A. Senseman, & Katherine Carson. (2007). Accelerated Solvent Extraction of Fluometuron from Selected Soils. Journal of AOAC International. 90(4). 1142–1145. 3 indexed citations
15.
Jordan, David L., Sarah Lancaster, Peter Johnson, et al.. (2006). Influence of Application Variables on Efficacy of Boron-Containing Fertilizers Applied to Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Peanut Science. 33(2). 104–111. 7 indexed citations
16.
Lancaster, Sarah, Richard L. Haney, Scott A. Senseman, Frank M. Hons, & James M. Chandler. (2006). Soil Microbial Activity Is Affected by Roundup WeatherMax and Pesticides Applied to Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 54(19). 7221–7226. 11 indexed citations
17.
Avila, Luis Antônio de, J.H. Massey, Scott A. Senseman, et al.. (2006). Imazethapyr Aqueous Photolysis, Reaction Quantum Yield, and Hydroxyl Radical Rate Constant. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 54(7). 2635–2639. 28 indexed citations
18.
Lancaster, Sarah, David L. Jordan, Janet F. Spears, et al.. (2005). Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) Control and Seed Production after 2,4-DB Applied Alone and with Fungicides or Insecticides. Weed Technology. 19(2). 451–455. 24 indexed citations
19.
Lancaster, Sarah, David L. Jordan, Alan C. York, et al.. (2005). Interactions of Clethodim and Sethoxydim with Selected Agrichemicals Applied to Peanut. Weed Technology. 19(2). 456–461. 15 indexed citations
20.
Lancaster, Sarah, et al.. (2004). Sicklepod Control in Peanut Seeded in Single and Twin Row Planting Patterns. Peanut Science. 31(1). 36–40. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by L. Scarponi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Md. Najmol Hoque Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Di Long Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Afsana Hannan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Richard A. Wesley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jill Schroeder Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gökhan Hacisalihoglu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anne-Helen Harding Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Guiwei Wang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stephen T. Lewis
Rankless by CCL
2026