Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Enhancing security and privacy in biometrics-based authentication systems
20011.0k citationsNalini Ratha, Jonathan H. Connell et al.profile →
On-line fingerprint verification
1997890 citationsAnil K. Jain, Hong Lin et al.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligenceprofile →
Generating Cancelable Fingerprint Templates
2007613 citationsNalini Ratha, Sharat Chikkerur et al.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligenceprofile →
An identity-authentication system using fingerprints
1997610 citationsAnil K. Jain, Hong Lin et al.profile →
Biometrics: Personal Identification in Networked Society
2013440 citationsAnil K. Jain, Ruud M. Bolle et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruud M. Bolle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruud M. Bolle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruud M. Bolle more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruud M. Bolle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruud M. Bolle. The network helps show where Ruud M. Bolle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruud M. Bolle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruud M. Bolle.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruud M. Bolle based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ruud M. Bolle. Ruud M. Bolle is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ratha, Nalini, Sharat Chikkerur, Jonathan H. Connell, & Ruud M. Bolle. (2007). Generating Cancelable Fingerprint Templates. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 29(4). 561–572.613 indexed citations breakdown →
Senior, Andrew & Ruud M. Bolle. (2001). Improved Fingerpring Matching by Distortion Removal. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems. 84(7). 825–832.61 indexed citations
Bolle, Ruud M., Sharath Pankanti, & Anil K. Jain. (1998). Biometrics, Personal Identification in Networked Society: Personal Identification in Networked Society. Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks.145 indexed citations
11.
Bolle, Ruud M., Boon-Lock Yeo, & Minerva M. Yeung. (1998). Video query: Research directions. IBM Journal of Research and Development. 42(2). 233–252.47 indexed citations
12.
Jain, Anil K., Hong Lin, & Ruud M. Bolle. (1997). On-line fingerprint verification. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 19(4). 302–314.890 indexed citations breakdown →
Kjeldsen, Rick, et al.. (1989). A homogeneous framework for visual recognition. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1578–1584.3 indexed citations
16.
Bolle, Ruud M., et al.. (1989). Computer vision research. 471–478.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.