Biometrics: Personal Identification in Networked Society
- Journal
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/b117227 →Countries where authors are citing Biometrics: Personal Identification in Networked Society
This map shows the geographic impact of Biometrics: Personal Identification in Networked Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Biometrics: Personal Identification in Networked Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biometrics: Personal Identification in Networked Society more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Biometrics: Personal Identification in Networked Society
This network shows the impact of Biometrics: Personal Identification in Networked Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Biometrics: Personal Identification in Networked Society.
About Biometrics: Personal Identification in Networked Society
This paper, published in 2013, received 440 indexed citations . Written by Anil K. Jain, Ruud M. Bolle and Sharath Pankanti. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Signal Processing (297 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (227 citations) and Information Systems (168 citations). Published in Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/b117227.