Ruud Jonkers

726 total citations
20 papers, 551 citations indexed

About

Ruud Jonkers is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruud Jonkers has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 551 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology and 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Ruud Jonkers's work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (5 papers) and Sustainable Building Design and Assessment (3 papers). Ruud Jonkers is often cited by papers focused on Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (5 papers) and Sustainable Building Design and Assessment (3 papers). Ruud Jonkers collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Ruud Jonkers's co-authors include Frank W.S.M. Verheggen, Gerjo Kok, Fred Nieman, Gerjo Kok, Albert Bakker, Lyda Blom, Herman P. Schaalma, Ree M. Meertens, Onno de Zwart and Inge de Weerdt and has published in prestigious journals such as Energy Policy, BMC Public Health and Obesity Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Ruud Jonkers

20 papers receiving 518 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruud Jonkers Netherlands 14 190 184 110 70 69 20 551
Alekhya Mascarenhas Canada 6 69 0.4× 227 1.2× 72 0.7× 30 0.4× 24 0.3× 6 487
Debra Humphris United Kingdom 15 267 1.4× 489 2.7× 22 0.2× 11 0.2× 88 1.3× 37 851
Richard Madden Australia 15 91 0.5× 227 1.2× 78 0.7× 9 0.1× 11 0.2× 42 731
Anika Kaczynski Germany 12 90 0.5× 268 1.5× 243 2.2× 33 0.5× 13 0.2× 30 645
Julie Bain Canada 4 75 0.4× 244 1.3× 74 0.7× 7 0.1× 22 0.3× 6 473
Liz Green United Kingdom 11 73 0.4× 153 0.8× 76 0.7× 4 0.1× 67 1.0× 42 389
Andrew Kestler Canada 16 379 2.0× 76 0.4× 37 0.3× 7 0.1× 10 0.1× 36 856
Pablo Villalobos Dintrans Chile 14 95 0.5× 194 1.1× 86 0.8× 19 0.3× 4 0.1× 58 547
Nichole Harvey Australia 9 139 0.7× 196 1.1× 55 0.5× 14 0.2× 14 0.2× 21 753
Annaliese Calhoun United States 5 90 0.5× 550 3.0× 101 0.9× 18 0.3× 10 0.1× 6 816

Countries citing papers authored by Ruud Jonkers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruud Jonkers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruud Jonkers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruud Jonkers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruud Jonkers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruud Jonkers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruud Jonkers. The network helps show where Ruud Jonkers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruud Jonkers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruud Jonkers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruud Jonkers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruud Jonkers. Ruud Jonkers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hesselink, Arlette E., Guy E.H.M. Rutten, Sander M Slootmaker, et al.. (2015). Effects of a lifestyle program in subjects with Impaired Fasting Glucose, a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial. BMC Family Practice. 16(1). 183–183. 12 indexed citations
2.
3.
Kok, Gerjo, et al.. (2010). Behavioural intentions in response to an influenza pandemic. BMC Public Health. 10(1). 174–174. 48 indexed citations
4.
Kremers, Stef, Astrid Reubsaet, Mark Martens, et al.. (2009). Systematic prevention of overweight and obesity in adults: a qualitative and quantitative literature analysis. Obesity Reviews. 11(5). 371–379. 48 indexed citations
5.
Jonkers, Ruud, et al.. (2007). Energy-related intervention success factors: a literature review. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 18 indexed citations
6.
Jonkers, Ruud, et al.. (2005). Target group segmentation makes sense: If one sheep leaps over the ditch, all the rest will follow. Energy Policy. 34(17). 3115–3123. 18 indexed citations
7.
Jonkers, Ruud, et al.. (2005). A strategy and protocol to increase diffusion of energy related innovations into the mainstream of housing associations. Energy Policy. 34(18). 4042–4049. 22 indexed citations
8.
Jonkers, Ruud, et al.. (2005). One size fits all? Policy instruments should fit the segments of target groups. Energy Policy. 34(18). 3464–3474. 43 indexed citations
9.
Blom, Lyda, et al.. (2004). Effects of a management technician on structured working in Dutch community pharmacies. Pharmacy World & Science. 26(4). 221–226. 4 indexed citations
10.
Jonkers, Ruud, et al.. (2004). A strategy to encourage housing associations to invest in energy conservation. Energy Policy. 33(18). 2374–2384. 34 indexed citations
11.
Jonkers, Ruud, et al.. (2003). Evaluation of patient opinions in a pharmacy-level intervention study. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 11(3). 143–151. 20 indexed citations
12.
Blom, Lyda, et al.. (2002). Patient oriented activities in Dutch community pharmacy: diffusion of innovations.. Pharmacy World & Science. 24(4). 154–161. 21 indexed citations
13.
Blom, Lyda, et al.. (2002). Community pharmacy and patient-oriented activities: the Dutch case. Patient Education and Counseling. 46(1). 39–45. 25 indexed citations
14.
Jonkers, Ruud, et al.. (2001). The diffusion process of patient education in Dutch community pharmacy: an exploration. Patient Education and Counseling. 42(2). 115–121. 15 indexed citations
15.
Verheggen, Frank W.S.M., Fred Nieman, & Ruud Jonkers. (1998). Determinants of patient participation in clinical studies requiring informed consent: Why patients enter a clinical trial. Patient Education and Counseling. 35(2). 111–125. 131 indexed citations
16.
Blom, Lyda, Ruud Jonkers, Gerjo Kok, & Albert Bakker. (1998). Patient Education in 20 Dutch Community Pharmacies: Analysis of Audiotaped Patient Contacts. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 6(2). 72–76. 14 indexed citations
17.
Verheggen, Frank W.S.M., Ruud Jonkers, & Gerjo Kok. (1996). Patients' perceptions on informed consent and the quality of information disclosure in clinical trials. Patient Education and Counseling. 29(2). 137–153. 57 indexed citations
18.
Hull, F. M., et al.. (1992). Comparison of Prescribing Habits of General Practitioners in The Netherlands versus England and Wales. PharmacoEconomics. 2(1). 77–86. 3 indexed citations
19.
Cuisinier, Marian C. J., et al.. (1986). Psychosocial care and education of the cancer patient: Strengthening the physician's role. Patient Education and Counseling. 8(1). 5–16. 11 indexed citations
20.
Pruyn, J.F.A. & Ruud Jonkers. (1984). Reach to recovery. Journal of the Institute of Health Education. 22(3). 92–99. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alekhya Mascarenhas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Debra Humphris Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Richard Madden Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anika Kaczynski Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Julie Bain Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Liz Green Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrew Kestler Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Pablo Villalobos Dintrans Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nichole Harvey Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Annaliese Calhoun
Rankless by CCL
2026