Anika Kaczynski

950 total citations
30 papers, 645 citations indexed

About

Anika Kaczynski is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Anika Kaczynski has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 645 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 8 papers in General Health Professions and 5 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Anika Kaczynski's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (13 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers). Anika Kaczynski is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (13 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers). Anika Kaczynski collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Anika Kaczynski's co-authors include Axel Mühlbacher, Peter Zweifel, F. Reed Johnson, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Bernhard Michalowsky, Ina Zwingmann, Jochen René Thyrian, Tilly Eichler, Diana Wucherer and Susanne Bethge and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease and BMC Health Services Research.

In The Last Decade

Anika Kaczynski

28 papers receiving 635 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anika Kaczynski Germany 12 268 243 134 90 62 30 645
Felicity Dewhurst United Kingdom 17 154 0.6× 93 0.4× 140 1.0× 95 1.1× 31 0.5× 61 749
Andrew Miles United Kingdom 17 514 1.9× 94 0.4× 182 1.4× 200 2.2× 40 0.6× 53 966
Jeannette G. van Manen Netherlands 12 156 0.6× 215 0.9× 111 0.8× 51 0.6× 28 0.5× 21 595
Sally Fowler‐Davis United Kingdom 14 222 0.8× 90 0.4× 76 0.6× 105 1.2× 55 0.9× 59 628
Carmen Huckel Schneider Australia 12 191 0.7× 87 0.4× 84 0.6× 139 1.5× 35 0.6× 45 701
Siw Waffenschmidt Germany 12 220 0.8× 68 0.3× 46 0.3× 141 1.6× 88 1.4× 27 978
Hye‐Young Jung United States 14 404 1.5× 152 0.6× 66 0.5× 109 1.2× 35 0.6× 58 764
Joelle H. Fong Singapore 15 335 1.3× 140 0.6× 39 0.3× 35 0.4× 81 1.3× 55 737
Line Bjørnskov Pedersen Denmark 16 349 1.3× 257 1.1× 32 0.2× 165 1.8× 75 1.2× 71 813
Chris L. Peterson Australia 14 251 0.9× 98 0.4× 107 0.8× 50 0.6× 32 0.5× 72 694

Countries citing papers authored by Anika Kaczynski

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anika Kaczynski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anika Kaczynski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anika Kaczynski more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anika Kaczynski

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anika Kaczynski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anika Kaczynski. The network helps show where Anika Kaczynski may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anika Kaczynski

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anika Kaczynski. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anika Kaczynski based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anika Kaczynski. Anika Kaczynski is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zwingmann, Ina, Adina Dreier, A. Esser, et al.. (2020). Why do family dementia caregivers reject caregiver support services? Analyzing types of rejection and associated health-impairments in a cluster-randomized controlled intervention trial. BMC Health Services Research. 20(1). 121–121. 28 indexed citations
2.
Michalowsky, Bernhard, Anika Kaczynski, & Wolfgang Hoffmann. (2019). Ökonomische und gesellschaftliche Herausforderungen der Demenz in Deutschland – Eine Metaanalyse. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz. 62(8). 981–992. 37 indexed citations
3.
Kaczynski, Anika, Bernhard Michalowsky, Tilly Eichler, et al.. (2019). Comorbidity in Dementia Diseases and Associated Health Care Resources Utilization and Cost. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 68(2). 635–646. 29 indexed citations
4.
Michalowsky, Bernhard, Feng Xie, Anika Kaczynski, & Wolfgang Hoffmann. (2018). CE3 - COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF DEMENTIA CARE MANAGEMENT ALONGSIDE A CLUSTER-RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED INTERVENTIONAL DELPHI TRIAL. Value in Health. 21. S3–S3. 1 indexed citations
5.
Mühlbacher, Axel, Anika Kaczynski, Franz‐Werner Dippel, & Susanne Bethge. (2018). PATIENT PRIORITIES FOR TREATMENT ATTRIBUTES IN ADJUNCTIVE DRUG THERAPY OF SEVERE HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA IN GERMANY: AN ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 34(3). 267–275. 4 indexed citations
6.
Law, Ernest H., Ruixuan Jiang, Anika Kaczynski, Axel Mühlbacher, & A. Simon Pickard. (2018). The Role of Personality in Treatment-Related Outcome Preferences Among Pharmacy Students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 83(7). 6891–6891. 5 indexed citations
7.
Zwingmann, Ina, Bernhard Michalowsky, A. Esser, et al.. (2018). Identifying Unmet Needs of Family Dementia Caregivers: Results of the Baseline Assessment of a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Intervention Trial. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 67(2). 527–539. 44 indexed citations
8.
Mühlbacher, Axel, Christin Juhnke, & Anika Kaczynski. (2017). Die Patientenperspektive in der Behandlung von Neuroendokrinen Tumoren: Eine Analyse mittels Analytic Hierarchy Process. TumorDiagnostik & Therapie. 38(1). 43–50. 1 indexed citations
9.
Law, Ernest H., et al.. (2017). Choice Blindness and Health-State Choices among Adolescents and Adults. Medical Decision Making. 37(6). 680–687. 5 indexed citations
10.
Mühlbacher, Axel, Anika Kaczynski, Katharina Schmidt, & Charalabos‐Markos Dintsios. (2017). Komplexe Entscheidungen im Gesundheitswesen: Die Bewertung und Saldierung von Nutzen und Schaden als Gegenstand der multikriteriellen Entscheidungsanalyse. Gesundheitsökonomie & Qualitätsmanagement. 23(3). 129–141.
11.
Kaczynski, Anika, et al.. (2016). PATIENTS’ PREFERENCES IN FUNCTIONAL DYSPEPSIA AND MOTILITY DISORDER: A DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENT. Value in Health. 19(3). A316–A316. 1 indexed citations
12.
Mühlbacher, Axel, Susanne Bethge, & Anika Kaczynski. (2016). TREATMENT AFTER ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME: ANALYSIS OF PATIENT'S PRIORITIES WITH ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 32(4). 284–291. 11 indexed citations
13.
Mühlbacher, Axel, Anika Kaczynski, Peter Zweifel, & F. Reed Johnson. (2016). Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview. Health Economics Review. 6(1). 2–2. 142 indexed citations
14.
Mühlbacher, Axel & Anika Kaczynski. (2015). Patientenpräferenzen in der medikamentösen Therapie von Diabetes Mellitus Typ 2. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz. 58(4-5). 452–466. 5 indexed citations
15.
16.
Mühlbacher, Axel & Anika Kaczynski. (2015). Making Good Decisions in Healthcare with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: The Use, Current Research and Future Development of MCDA. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. 14(1). 29–40. 102 indexed citations
17.
Kaczynski, Anika, et al.. (2014). Patient Preferences in Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Stated Preference Surveys. Value in Health. 17(7). A356–A356. 1 indexed citations
18.
Juhnke, Christin, et al.. (2014). Patients' Priorities in the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Analytic Hierarchy Process. Value in Health. 17(7). A650–A650. 2 indexed citations
19.
Bethge, Susanne, et al.. (2013). Patients Preferences Regarding the Treatment of Type II Diabetes Mellitus: Comparison of Best-Worst Scaling and Analytic Hierarchy Process. Value in Health. 16(7). A446–A446. 5 indexed citations
20.
Bethge, Susanne, et al.. (2013). Patients Preferences for Long-Term Treatment After Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Discrete-Choice Experiment and Analytic Hierarchy Process. Value in Health. 16(7). A534–A534. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Felicity Dewhurst Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrew Miles Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jeannette G. van Manen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sally Fowler‐Davis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carmen Huckel Schneider Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Siw Waffenschmidt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hye‐Young Jung Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joelle H. Fong Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Line Bjørnskov Pedersen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Chris L. Peterson
Rankless by CCL
2026