Jo Hockley

2.3k total citations
68 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Jo Hockley is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jo Hockley has authored 68 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 46 papers in General Health Professions and 13 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jo Hockley's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (49 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (37 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (10 papers). Jo Hockley is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (49 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (37 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (10 papers). Jo Hockley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Belgium. Jo Hockley's co-authors include Julie Watson, David Clark, Belinda Dewar, Katherine Froggatt, Julie Kinley, Scott A Murray, Rachael A. Dunlop, R.J. Davies, Sam H. Ahmedzai and David Oxenham and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Age and Ageing and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

Jo Hockley

64 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jo Hockley United Kingdom 22 1.0k 799 368 200 166 68 1.4k
Lara Pivodic Belgium 19 1.1k 1.1× 782 1.0× 401 1.1× 281 1.4× 193 1.2× 57 1.4k
Julie C. Lima United States 21 816 0.8× 924 1.2× 325 0.9× 138 0.7× 139 0.8× 45 1.4k
Tinne Smets Belgium 23 1.1k 1.1× 735 0.9× 449 1.2× 203 1.0× 163 1.0× 79 1.3k
Ruth Piers Belgium 17 921 0.9× 620 0.8× 275 0.7× 283 1.4× 146 0.9× 57 1.2k
John G. Cagle United States 24 866 0.8× 656 0.8× 438 1.2× 148 0.7× 175 1.1× 104 1.5k
Jennifer Kapo United States 18 861 0.8× 433 0.5× 310 0.8× 147 0.7× 267 1.6× 43 1.2k
Karen Harrison Dening United Kingdom 22 987 0.9× 1.0k 1.3× 424 1.2× 159 0.8× 71 0.4× 141 1.6k
Marieke Groot Netherlands 21 1.1k 1.0× 438 0.5× 295 0.8× 151 0.8× 277 1.7× 53 1.4k
Lisa C. Welch United States 13 762 0.7× 486 0.6× 374 1.0× 164 0.8× 116 0.7× 32 1.0k
Lisa Jane Brighton United Kingdom 18 667 0.6× 384 0.5× 223 0.6× 181 0.9× 157 0.9× 42 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Hockley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Hockley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Hockley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Hockley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Hockley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Hockley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Hockley. The network helps show where Jo Hockley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jo Hockley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jo Hockley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jo Hockley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jo Hockley. Jo Hockley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Forbat, Liz, Karen Spilsbury, Brendan McCormack, et al.. (2024). Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12(19). 1–134. 1 indexed citations
3.
Forbat, Liz, Brendan McCormack, Karen Spilsbury, et al.. (2024). Negotiating pace, focus and identities: Patient/public involvement/engagement in a palliative care study. Sociology of Health & Illness. 46(7). 1327–1344. 3 indexed citations
4.
Hockley, Jo, et al.. (2024). Practicalities of promoting practice‐based learning in end of life care for care home staff: Lessons from “online” supportive conversations and reflection sessions. International Journal of Older People Nursing. 19(1). e12598–e12598. 1 indexed citations
5.
Johnston, Lucy, et al.. (2023). Supporting the Wellbeing of Care Home Staff: Lessons from the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 195–208.
6.
Pringle, Jan, et al.. (2021). Correction to: Pain assessment and management in care homes: understanding the context through a scoping review. BMC Geriatrics. 21(1). 504–504. 1 indexed citations
7.
Fawcett, Tonks N, et al.. (2019). Care home nursing: Co-creating curricular content with student nurses. Nurse Education Today. 84. 104233–104233. 11 indexed citations
8.
MacArthur, Juliet & Jo Hockley. (2018). Board editorial: Care homes as a setting for research and policy development. Journal of research in nursing. 23(2-3). 105–108. 1 indexed citations
9.
Hockley, Jo, et al.. (2017). Implementing the Namaste Care Program for residents with advanced dementia: exploring the perceptions of families and staff in UK care homes. Annals of Palliative Medicine. 6(4). 327–339. 30 indexed citations
10.
Hockley, Jo, et al.. (2016). Fixing the broken image of care homes, could a ‘care home innovation centre’ be the answer?. Age and Ageing. 46(2). 175–178. 8 indexed citations
11.
Stewart, Robert, Matthew Hotopf, Michael Dewey, et al.. (2014). Current prevalence of dementia, depression and behavioural problems in the older adult care home sector: the South East London Care Home Survey. Age and Ageing. 43(4). 562–567. 62 indexed citations
12.
Froggatt, Katherine, Kevin Brazil, Katharina Heimerl, et al.. (2013). Palliative care in long-term care settings for older people : findings from an EAPC taskforce. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 30 indexed citations
13.
Froggatt, Katherine, et al.. (2013). Palliative Care in Long-Term Care Settings for Older People. Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast). 18(1). 26–28. 10 indexed citations
14.
Kinley, John, Jo Hockley, Michael Dewey, et al.. (2013). The provision of care for residents dying in UK nursing care homes. Age and Ageing. 43(3). 375–379. 63 indexed citations
15.
Froggatt, Katherine, et al.. (2012). The EAPC Taskforce on palliative care in long-term care settings for older people: Mapping good practice. Palliative Medicine. 26(4). 392–393. 2 indexed citations
16.
Froggatt, Katherine, Jo Hockley, Deborah Parker, & Kevin Brazil. (2010). A system lifeworld perspective on dying in long term care settings for older people: Contested states in contested places. Health & Place. 17(1). 263–268. 25 indexed citations
17.
Hockley, Jo. (2007). Diagnosing the dying process in the care home setting. 1(2). 58–63. 1 indexed citations
18.
Hockley, Jo. (2000). Psychosocial Aspects in Palliative Care-Communicating with the Patient and Family. Acta Oncologica. 39(8). 905–910. 15 indexed citations
19.
Hockley, Jo. (1996). The development of a palliative care team at the Western General Hospital, Edinburgh. Supportive Care in Cancer. 4(2). 77–81. 8 indexed citations
20.
Hockley, Jo, Rachael A. Dunlop, & R.J. Davies. (1988). Survey of distressing symptoms in dying patients and their families in hospital and the response to a symptom control team. BMJ. 296(6638). 1715–1717. 100 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026