Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Lister's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Lister with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Lister more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Lister. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Lister. The network helps show where Ruth Lister may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Lister
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Lister.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Lister based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Lister. Ruth Lister is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lister, Ruth, et al.. (2012). Ciudadanía y género. Debate Feminista. 45.1 indexed citations
3.
Hills, John, Mike Brewer, Stephen P. Jenkins, et al.. (2010). An Anatomy of Economic Inequality in the UK - Report of the National Equality Panel. BMJ Case Reports.167 indexed citations
4.
Glennerster, Howard, Jonathan Bradshaw, Ruth Lister, & Olle Lundberg. (2009). Reducing the Risks to Health: The role of social protection. Report of the Social Protection Task Group for the Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England Post 2010. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).1 indexed citations
5.
Lister, Ruth. (2009). A Nordic Nirvana? Gender, Citizenship, and Social Justice in the Nordic Welfare States. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).1 indexed citations
6.
Lister, Ruth, et al.. (2008). Why money matters : family income, poverty and children's lives.33 indexed citations
Lister, Ruth, Williams Fiona, Anneli Anttonen, et al.. (2007). Gendering citizenship in Western Europe. Bristol University Press eBooks.115 indexed citations
11.
Lister, Ruth. (2006). An Agenda for Children: Investing in the Future or Promoting Well-being in the Present?. Chapters.12 indexed citations
12.
Lister, Ruth. (2005). Being Feminist. Government and Opposition. 40(3). 442–463.8 indexed citations
Lister, Ruth. (1992). Women's economic dependency and social security. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).22 indexed citations
Lister, Ruth, et al.. (1981). Unemployment : who pays the price?.10 indexed citations
18.
Lister, Ruth. (1979). The no-cost no-benefit review.1 indexed citations
19.
Lister, Ruth & Tony Emmett. (1976). Under the safety net.9 indexed citations
20.
Lister, Ruth. (1975). Social security : the case for reform.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.