Ruth Filik

3.9k total citations
76 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Ruth Filik is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Filik has authored 76 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 36 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 27 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ruth Filik's work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (31 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (31 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (24 papers). Ruth Filik is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (31 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (31 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (24 papers). Ruth Filik collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Ruth Filik's co-authors include Hartmut Leuthold, Dominic Thompson, Kevin B. Paterson, Anthony J. Sanford, Christina Ralph‐Nearman, Linda M. Moxey, Alastair G. Gale, Ian Grant Mackenzie, Simon P. Liversedge and David Gerrett and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Brain Research.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Filik

75 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Ruth Filik

ECP

DEP

Trudy Johnson United States

Xuejun Bai China

George E. MacKinnon United States

Jinni A. Harrigan United States

Lucy Pickering United Kingdom

Jan Antfolk Finland

Luís Faísca Portugal

Michael J. Lawson Australia

Aron Wolfe Siegman United States

Emma Marsden United Kingdom

Trudy Johnson United States

Ruth Filik

397 ×0.6

ECP

151 ×0.2

280 ×0.6

DEP

226 ×0.7

372 ×1.2

Citations per year, relative to Ruth Filik Ruth Filik (= 1×) peers Trudy Johnson

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Filik

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Filik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Filik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Filik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Filik

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Filik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Filik. The network helps show where Ruth Filik may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Filik

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Filik. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Filik based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Filik. Ruth Filik is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Olkoniemi, Henri & Ruth Filik. (2024). Introduction to the special issue on new approaches to figurative language research. Discourse Processes. 61(1-2). 1–5.

Chen, Yihua, et al.. (2024). Individual differences in emoji comprehension: Gender, age, and culture. PLoS ONE. 19(2). e0297379–e0297379. 12 indexed citations

Filik, Ruth, et al.. (2023). Anaphoric reference to mereological entities. Discourse Processes. 60(3). 202–223. 1 indexed citations

Filik, Ruth, et al.. (2023). Individual differences in sarcasm interpretation and use: Evidence from the UK and China.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 49(3). 445–463. 9 indexed citations

Filik, Ruth, et al.. (2023). The role of social status in sarcasm interpretation: Evidence from the United Kingdom and China. Discourse Processes. 61(1-2). 69–89. 2 indexed citations

Taylor, Hannah, et al.. (2022). Autism, Attachment, and Alexithymia: Investigating Emoji Comprehension. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 40(9). 2211–2224. 3 indexed citations

Ralph‐Nearman, Christina, et al.. (2021). An eye-tracking study examining the relationship between males’ eating disorder symptomatology, body mass index, and expectations about character behaviour in text. Cognition & Emotion. 35(8). 1543–1558. 1 indexed citations

Filik, Ruth, et al.. (2021). Emoji as a tool to aid the comprehension of written sarcasm: Evidence from younger and older adults. Computers in Human Behavior. 126. 106971–106971. 35 indexed citations

Filik, Ruth, et al.. (2020). Examining the role of context in written sarcasm comprehension: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 46(10). 1966–1976. 4 indexed citations

10.

Ralph‐Nearman, Christina & Ruth Filik. (2020). Development and validation of new figural scales for female body dissatisfaction assessment on two dimensions: thin-ideal and muscularity-ideal. BMC Public Health. 20(1). 1114–1114. 17 indexed citations

11.

Ralph‐Nearman, Christina, et al.. (2019). A systematic and methodological review of attentional biases in eating disorders: Food, body, and perfectionism. Brain and Behavior. 9(12). e01458–e01458. 41 indexed citations

12.

Filik, Ruth, et al.. (2019). What is the difference between irony and sarcasm? An fMRI study. Cortex. 115. 112–122. 27 indexed citations

13.

Ralph‐Nearman, Christina & Ruth Filik. (2018). Eating disorder symptomatology and body mass index are associated with readers' expectations about character behavior: Evidence from eye‐tracking during reading. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 51(9). 1070–1079. 8 indexed citations

14.

Ralph‐Nearman, Christina & Ruth Filik. (2018). New Body Scales Reveal Body Dissatisfaction, Thin-Ideal, and Muscularity-Ideal in Males. American Journal of Men s Health. 12(4). 740–750. 44 indexed citations

15.

Filik, Ruth, et al.. (2016). An eye-tracking investigation of written sarcasm comprehension: The roles of familiarity and context.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 42(12). 1867–1893. 26 indexed citations

16.

Filik, Ruth & Hartmut Leuthold. (2013). The role of character-based knowledge in online narrative comprehension: Evidence from eye movements and ERPs. Brain Research. 1506. 94–104. 36 indexed citations

17.

Filik, Ruth, Kevin B. Paterson, & Simon P. Liversedge. (2009). The influence of only and even on online semantic interpretation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 16(4). 678–683. 17 indexed citations

18.

Filik, Ruth, Anthony J. Sanford, & Hartmut Leuthold. (2008). Processing Pronouns without Antecedents: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 20(7). 1315–1326. 47 indexed citations

19.

Filik, Ruth, et al.. (2004). Drug name confusion: evaluating the effectiveness of capital (“Tall Man”) letters using eye movement data. Social Science & Medicine. 59(12). 2597–2601. 60 indexed citations

20.

Paterson, Kevin B., Simon P. Liversedge, Caroline F. Rowland, & Ruth Filik. (2003). Children's comprehension of sentences with focus particles. Cognition. 89(3). 263–294. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact