Ruth English

1.3k total citations
31 papers, 802 citations indexed

About

Ruth English is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Oncology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth English has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 802 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 8 papers in Oncology and 8 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Ruth English's work include Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (9 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (8 papers) and AI in cancer detection (8 papers). Ruth English is often cited by papers focused on Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (9 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (8 papers) and AI in cancer detection (8 papers). Ruth English collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Ruth English's co-authors include Leticia Campo, Nigel Beasley, Peter H. Watson, William S. Sly, Adrian L. Harris, Charles C. Wykoff, Peter J. Ratcliffe, Jaromı́r Pastorek, Stephen Chia and Emily Banks and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal Of Pathology, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging and Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

In The Last Decade

Ruth English

29 papers receiving 762 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth English United Kingdom 12 251 196 194 159 142 31 802
Akinori Hashiguchi Japan 19 195 0.8× 124 0.6× 276 1.4× 114 0.7× 56 0.4× 117 1.2k
Carla Wauters Netherlands 17 388 1.5× 204 1.0× 85 0.4× 245 1.5× 323 2.3× 41 1.0k
Giu‐Cheng Hsu Taiwan 19 267 1.1× 173 0.9× 423 2.2× 94 0.6× 269 1.9× 43 980
Vincenzo L’Imperio Italy 18 175 0.7× 241 1.2× 245 1.3× 245 1.5× 78 0.5× 103 953
William C. Allsbrook United States 19 223 0.9× 194 1.0× 214 1.1× 218 1.4× 85 0.6× 33 1.4k
Olorunsola F. Agbaje United Kingdom 15 438 1.7× 176 0.9× 90 0.5× 201 1.3× 262 1.8× 26 971
Jerome Cheng United States 14 101 0.4× 185 0.9× 117 0.6× 305 1.9× 58 0.4× 49 627
Brigitte Wilczek Sweden 12 276 1.1× 230 1.2× 65 0.3× 170 1.1× 201 1.4× 26 784
Alan B. Hollingsworth United States 19 205 0.8× 428 2.2× 288 1.5× 222 1.4× 453 3.2× 53 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth English

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth English's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth English with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth English more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth English

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth English. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth English. The network helps show where Ruth English may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth English

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth English. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth English based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth English. Ruth English is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
English, Ruth, et al.. (2014). PB.45. Correlation of perilesional tissue stiffness measured by ultrasound strain elastography with breast density. Breast Cancer Research. 16(S1). 1 indexed citations
3.
English, Ruth, et al.. (2010). Stereotactic core biopsy of an impalpable screen-detected breast lesion using acupuncture-analgesia. British Journal of Radiology. 83(994). e208–e210.
4.
Adams, Rosie F., et al.. (2010). Slip Imaging: Reducing Ambiguity in Breast Lesion Assessment. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 36(12). 2027–2035. 6 indexed citations
5.
Linguraru, Marius George, Kostas Marias, Ruth English, & M. Brady. (2006). A biologically inspired algorithm for microcalcification cluster detection. Medical Image Analysis. 10(6). 850–862. 38 indexed citations
6.
Banks, Emily, Gillian Reeves, Valerie Beral, et al.. (2005). Hormone replacement therapy and false positive recall in the Million Women Study: patterns of use, hormonal constituents and consistency of effect. Breast Cancer Research. 8(1). R8–R8. 59 indexed citations
7.
Banks, Emily, Gillian Reeves, Valerie Beral, et al.. (2004). Influence of personal characteristics of individual women on sensitivity and specificity of mammography in the Million Women Study: cohort study. BMJ. 329(7464). 477–477. 83 indexed citations
8.
Behrenbruch, Christian, Kostas Marias, Paul A. Armitage, et al.. (2003). Fusion of contrast-enhanced breast MR and mammographic imaging data. Medical Image Analysis. 7(3). 311–340. 40 indexed citations
9.
Brady, J M, et al.. (2002). Nonrigid registration of 3-D free-hand ultrasound images of the breast. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 21(4). 405–412. 50 indexed citations
10.
Banks, Emily, Valerie Beral, Isobel Barnes, et al.. (2001). Comparison of various characteristics of women who do and do not attend for breast cancer screening. Breast Cancer Research. 4(1). R1–R1. 111 indexed citations
11.
Brady, J. Michael, et al.. (2001). The use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to model breast compression in x-ray mammography for MR/x-ray data fusion. 688–696. 10 indexed citations
12.
Tchou, Julia, Ruth English, Ralph Highnam, et al.. (2001). A mammographic dilemma: calcification or haemosiderin as a cause of opacities? Validation of a new digital diagnostic tool. British Journal of Radiology. 74(887). 1048–1051. 2 indexed citations
13.
Brady, Michael, et al.. (2001). Non-rigid registration in 3D free-hand ultrasound imaging of the breast. International Congress Series. 1230. 1199–1200. 3 indexed citations
14.
Wykoff, Charles C., Nigel Beasley, Peter H. Watson, et al.. (2001). Expression of the Hypoxia-Inducible and Tumor-Associated Carbonic Anhydrases in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast. American Journal Of Pathology. 158(3). 1011–1019. 206 indexed citations
15.
Brady, J. Michael, et al.. (2000). Reconstructing microcalcification clusters in 3-D using a parameterised breast compression model. 1214. 723–728. 1 indexed citations
16.
Brady, J. Michael, et al.. (1999). Detecting calcifications in mammograms using the h(int) representation. 1191. 373–377.
17.
Highnam, Ralph, Michael Brady, & Ruth English. (1999). Detecting film-screen artifacts in mammography using a model-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 18(10). 1016–1024. 9 indexed citations
18.
English, Ruth, et al.. (1989). Osteosarcoma ? presumed lymph node metastases in two cases. Skeletal Radiology. 18(4). 289–293. 4 indexed citations
19.
English, Ruth, Nigel Soper, B. J. Shepstone, Judith M. Hockaday, & Gregory Stores. (1989). Five patients with Rasmussenʼs syndrome investigated by single-photon-emission computed tomography. Nuclear Medicine Communications. 10(1). 5–14. 21 indexed citations
20.
Kirkham, N & Ruth English. (1984). "I have a bone stuck in my throat".. BMJ. 289(6442). 424–425. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026