Ruth Anderson
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Ceramics and Composites top 5%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- Thomas R. ShearerGavin MountjoyRobert J. NewportDavid M. PickupGraham W. WallidgeLarry L. DavidL.L. DavidMark E. Smith
- Topics
- Connexins and lens biology (10 papers)Selenium in Biological Systems (9 papers)Glass properties and applications (9 papers)
- Journals
- ScienceBloodChemistry of Materials
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomJapan
In The Last Decade
Ruth Anderson
34 papers receiving 833 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Materials Chemistry 380
- Molecular Biology 287
- Ceramics and Composites 233
- Nutrition and Dietetics 103
- Inorganic Chemistry 98
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Anderson
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Anderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Anderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Anderson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Anderson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Anderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Anderson. The network helps show where Ruth Anderson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Anderson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Anderson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Anderson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Anderson. Ruth Anderson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29 | |
| 2 | 68 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 41 | |
| 6 | 30 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 103 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | Calpain in rat cornea. | 3 |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 64 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | Influence of selenite and fourteen trace elements on cataractogenesis in the rat. | 23 |
| 18 | 43 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | Marrow transplantation in newborn mice with hereditary spherocytosis: a model system. | 4 |
About Ruth Anderson
Ruth Anderson is a scholar working on Ceramics and Composites, Nutrition and Dietetics and Catalysis, having authored 34 papers that have together received 867 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Connexins and lens biology (10 papers), Selenium in Biological Systems (9 papers) and Glass properties and applications (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ceramics and Composites (233 citations), Materials Chemistry (380 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (98 citations). Ruth Anderson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Thomas R. Shearer, Gavin Mountjoy, Robert J. Newport, David M. Pickup, Graham W. Wallidge, Larry L. David, L.L. David, Mark E. Smith, Jacqueline M. Cole and Mary E. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Blood and Chemistry of Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.