Russell Newcombe
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Toxicology top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Howard ParkerFiona MeashamKarenza MooreJohn E. FiskCatharine MontgomeryErnest DruckerAllison MatthewsP. A. O'Hare
- Topics
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (5 papers)Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (3 papers)Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Russell Newcombe
16 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 171
- Epidemiology 442
- Sociology and Political Science 238
- Clinical Psychology 234
- General Health Professions 227
- Toxicology 227
Countries citing papers authored by Russell Newcombe
This map shows the geographic impact of Russell Newcombe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Russell Newcombe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Russell Newcombe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Russell Newcombe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Russell Newcombe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Russell Newcombe. The network helps show where Russell Newcombe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Russell Newcombe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Russell Newcombe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Russell Newcombe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Russell Newcombe. Russell Newcombe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 152 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 64 | |
| 9 | Does cannabis adversely affect working memory function | 1 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 134 | |
| 13 | Practical Statistics for Medical Researchbreakdown → | 915 |
| 14 | Living With Heroin: The Impact of a Drugs Epidemic on an English Community | 104 |
| 15 | 73 | |
| 16 | 52 |
About Russell Newcombe
Russell Newcombe is a scholar working on Toxicology, Biological Psychiatry and Conservation, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (5 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (3 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (227 citations), Epidemiology (442 citations) and Clinical Psychology (234 citations). Russell Newcombe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Howard Parker, Fiona Measham, Karenza Moore, John E. Fisk, Catharine Montgomery, Ernest Drucker, Allison Matthews, P. A. O'Hare, Michelle Wareing and Philip N. Murphy. Their work appears in journals such as Psychopharmacology, Addiction and Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.