Karenza Moore
- Toxicology top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Fiona MeashamRussell NewcombeMarie GriffithsDavid M. WoodPaul I. DarganHelen RichardsonAlison AdamSteven Miles
- Topics
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (5 papers)Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers)Psychedelics and Drug Studies (4 papers)
- Journals
- European Journal of Information SystemsInformation Communication & SocietyGender Work and Organization
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Karenza Moore
27 papers receiving 700 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Toxicology 299
- Clinical Psychology 265
- Epidemiology 239
- Sociology and Political Science 205
- Gender Studies 133
Countries citing papers authored by Karenza Moore
This map shows the geographic impact of Karenza Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karenza Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karenza Moore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karenza Moore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karenza Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karenza Moore. The network helps show where Karenza Moore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karenza Moore
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karenza Moore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karenza Moore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karenza Moore. Karenza Moore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 68 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 152 | |
| 7 | 82 | |
| 8 | It's the most fun you can have for twenty quid: Meanings, Motivations and Consequences of British Ketamine Use. | 7 |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | Book review of Phil Hadfield (2006) Bar wars: contesting the night in contemporary British cities | 1 |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Being an IT in IT : gendered identities in the IT workplace. | 8 |
| 15 | Issues raised by the women in IT (WINIT) project. | 2 |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | The women in IT (WINIT) final report | 7 |
| 18 | Reflecting on reflexivity:fifteen years of club research | 0 |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Karenza Moore
Karenza Moore is a scholar working on Toxicology, Gender Studies and Urban Studies, having authored 29 papers that have together received 773 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (5 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers) and Psychedelics and Drug Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (299 citations), Gender Studies (133 citations) and Clinical Psychology (265 citations). Karenza Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Fiona Measham, Russell Newcombe, Marie Griffiths, David M. Wood, Paul I. Dargan, Helen Richardson, Alison Adam, Steven Miles, Claire Keogh and Jeanette Østergaard. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Information Systems, Information Communication & Society and Gender Work and Organization.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.