Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Review on Recent Trends and Future Developments in Electrochemical Sensing
202484 citationsRimmy Singh, Ruchi Gupta et al.ACS Omegaprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruchi Gupta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruchi Gupta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruchi Gupta more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruchi Gupta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruchi Gupta. The network helps show where Ruchi Gupta may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruchi Gupta
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruchi Gupta.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruchi Gupta based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ruchi Gupta. Ruchi Gupta is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Singh, Rimmy, Ruchi Gupta, Deepak Bansal, Rachna Bhateria, & Sharma Mona. (2024). A Review on Recent Trends and Future Developments in Electrochemical Sensing. ACS Omega. 9(7). 7336–7356.84 indexed citations breakdown →
Gupta, Ruchi, et al.. (2017). A study to evaluate the effectiveness of Bupivacaine (0.5%) versus Ropivacaine (0.5%, 0.75%) in patients undergoing upper limb surgery under brachial plexus block. Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia. 4(2). 153–159.1 indexed citations
11.
Gupta, Ruchi, et al.. (2017). To study the effect of oral pregabalin as premedicant on post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing hysterectomy after spinal anaesthesia. Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia. 4(1). 16–20.2 indexed citations
Gupta, Ruchi, et al.. (2013). Mobile Web Analytics. 2(3).1 indexed citations
16.
Gupta, Ruchi, et al.. (2010). Bioefficacy and persistence of Indoxacarb on Solanum melongena. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences. 18(1). 278–280.7 indexed citations
17.
Gupta, Ruchi, et al.. (2009). Plain lignocaine versus mixture of lignocaine, fentanyl and pancuronium for intravenous regional anaesthesia. Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology. 25(3). 301.1 indexed citations
18.
Gupta, Ruchi, R. P. Awasthi, & S. J. Kolte. (2004). Influence of Sowing Dates on Incidence of Sclerotinia Stem Rot of Rapeseed-Mustard. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences. 12(1). 223–224.2 indexed citations
19.
Gupta, Ruchi, R. P. Awasthi, & S. J. Kolte. (2004). Effect of nitrogen and sulphur on incidence of Sclerotinia rot of mustard. Indian Phytopathology. 57(2). 193–194.2 indexed citations
20.
Gupta, Ruchi, R. P. Awasthi, & S. J. Kolte. (2003). Influence of sowing dates and weather factors on development of Alternaria blight on rapeseed-mustard. Indian Phytopathology. 56(4). 398–402.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.