R.T. Naylor

799 citations
21 papers · 344 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

R.T. Naylor

19 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

R.T. Naylor
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Space and Planetary Science 14
  • Sociology and Political Science 246
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 53
  • Accounting 24
  • Information Systems 46
Replace Petrus C. van Duyne with:
Petrus C. van Duyne Netherlands
Matías Dewey Germany
Simon Butt Australia
Pino Arlacchi
Oren Gross United States
Anthony Amicelle France
Laurent Fourchard France
Colin Warbrick United Kingdom
Michael Wood United Kingdom
Guillermo Trejo United States
R.T. Naylor relative to Petrus C. van Duyne Netherlands Petrus C. van Duyne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Petrus C. van Duyne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R.T. Naylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.T. Naylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.T. Naylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.T. Naylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.T. Naylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.T. Naylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.T. Naylor. The network helps show where R.T. Naylor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside R.T. Naylor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R.T. Naylor Line = papers co-authored together R.T. Naylor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200384
2 199947
3 200537
4 199925
5 199923
6 200620
7 200920
8
Major Issues Relating to Organized Crime : within the Context of Economic Relationships
199916
9 198315
10 200714
11 200811
12 199610
13 19948
14
License to Loot? A Critique of Follow-the-Money Methods in Crime Control Policy
20016
15 19863
16 20142
17 20061
18 20061
19 19821
20 19840

About R.T. Naylor

R.T. Naylor is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Political Science and International Relations, Finance and Molecular Biology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (9 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (3 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (2 papers), Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (2 papers), Economic, financial, and policy analysis (1 paper), Archaeological Research and Protection (1 paper) and Art History and Market Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (14 citations), Sociology and Political Science (246 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (53 citations), Accounting (24 citations) and Information Systems (46 citations). R.T. Naylor has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael Levi, Phil Williams, Margaret E. Beare, Liora Salter and Paul Heyer. Their work appears in journals such as Crime Law and Social Change, Labour / Le Travail, Canadian Public Policy, Third World Quarterly and Canadian Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact