Countries where authors publish in Canadian Historical Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Canadian Historical Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Canadian Historical Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Canadian Historical Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Canadian Historical Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in Canadian Historical Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Canadian Historical Review.
About Canadian Historical Review
The 1.4k papers published in Canadian Historical Review in the last decades have received a total of 5.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Canadian Historical Review usually cover History and Philosophy of Science (188 papers), Sociology and Political Science (1000 papers), History (197 papers), Anthropology (83 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (202 papers) specifically the topics of Canadian Identity and History (884 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (181 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (82 papers), Australian History and Society (80 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (52 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (51 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (51 papers) and Indigenous Studies and Ecology (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Canadian Historical Review are J. M. S. Careless, Ian McKay, Tina Loo, Ian Milligan, Veronica Strong‐Boag, Joy Parr, Joan Sangster, Desmond Morton, Ruth Phillips and Julie Cruikshank.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.