RS Ling
- Internal Medicine top 5%
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management 2
- Surgery top 2%
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 6
- Orthopedic Infections and Treatments 5
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 4
- Hip disorders and treatments 1
- Muscle and Compartmental Disorders 1
- Oral Surgery top 5%
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 10%
-
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management 1
-
- Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis 1
- Co-authors
- GA GieLars LinderA. John TimperleyT.J.J.H. SlooffJ.-P. SimonC. R. HowieAmanda LeeJean-Pierre Simon
- Cited by
- Internal MedicineSurgeryOral Surgery
- Journals
- Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume (5 papers)PubMed (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenBelgium
In The Last Decade
RS Ling
7 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Internal Medicine 137
- Surgery 1.3k
- Oral Surgery 63
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 66
- Biomedical Engineering 136
Countries citing papers authored by RS Ling
This map shows the geographic impact of RS Ling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by RS Ling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites RS Ling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by RS Ling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by RS Ling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by RS Ling. The network helps show where RS Ling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 11 scholars most cited alongside RS Ling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Contained morselized allograft in revision total hip arthroplasty. Surgical technique. | 1993 | 107 |
| 2 | Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplastybreakdown → | 1993 | 587 |
| 3 | 1993 | 163 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 121 | |
| 5 | 1990 | 255 | |
| 6 | 1990 | 87 | |
| 7 | 1987 | 94 |
About RS Ling
RS Ling is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Surgery, Emergency Medical Services, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Infectious Diseases, having authored 7 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (6 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (5 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (4 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (1 paper), Muscle and Compartmental Disorders (1 paper), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (1 paper) and Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (137 citations), Surgery (1.3k citations), Oral Surgery (63 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (66 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (136 citations). RS Ling has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include GA Gie, Lars Linder, A. John Timperley, T.J.J.H. Slooff, J.-P. Simon, C. R. Howie, Amanda Lee, Jean-Pierre Simon, Catherine B. Lawrence and T. D. Bunker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.