Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty
1993587 citationsGA Gie, Lars Linder et al.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volumeprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by A. John Timperley
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of A. John Timperley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. John Timperley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. John Timperley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. John Timperley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. John Timperley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. John Timperley. The network helps show where A. John Timperley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. John Timperley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. John Timperley.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. John Timperley based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. John Timperley. A. John Timperley is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Timperley, A. John, et al.. (2018). THE SPAIRE TECHNIQUE ALLOWS HIP ARTHROPLASTY WITH DIVISION OF ONLY THE OBTURATOR EXTERNUS TENDON.1 indexed citations
Whitehouse, Sarah L., et al.. (2016). OUTPATIENT 3-D GAIT ANALYSIS ONE YEAR AFTER THA USING A PORTABLE IMU SYSTEM. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume. 1–1.3 indexed citations
6.
Wilson, Matthew, et al.. (2016). Femoral impaction bone grafting in revision hip arthroplasty: 705 cases from the originating centre. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).3 indexed citations
Ling, R. S. M., Graham A. Gie, A. John Timperley, et al.. (2010). The Exeter Hip: 40 Years of Innovation in Total Hip Arthroplasty.23 indexed citations
Hubble, M. J. W., et al.. (2009). Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.1 indexed citations
Sierra, Rafael J., et al.. (2008). THE EXETER UNIVERSAL CEMENTED FEMORAL COMPONENT AT 14 TO 17 YEARS: AN UPDATE ON THE FIRST 325 HIPS. 318–318.4 indexed citations
15.
Charity, John, et al.. (2005). THE EXETER POLISHED STEM IN THE LONG TERM: A SURVIVORSHIP STUDY TO THE 33RD YEAR OF FOLLOW-UP AND A STUDY OF STEM SUBSIDENCE. 361–361.3 indexed citations
16.
Timperley, A. John, Brett Halliday, Hugh English, Graham A. Gie, & R. S. M. Ling. (2004). O1372 FEMORAL IMPACTION GRAFTING WITH CEMENT IN REVISION TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT – EVOLUTION OF THE TECHNIQUE AND RESULTS. 263–263.16 indexed citations
Gie, GA, Lars Linder, RS Ling, et al.. (1993). Contained morselized allograft in revision total hip arthroplasty. Surgical technique.. PubMed. 24(4). 717–25.107 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.