Rose McCloskey

49 papers receiving 598 citations

Peers

Rose McCloskey
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Research and Theory 37
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 51
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 32
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 71
  • General Health Professions 359
Replace Joan Stanley with:
Joan Stanley United States
Vidar Melby United Kingdom
Margaret Keatings Canada
Jane Bostick United States
Mary Flatley United Kingdom
Donna J. Munroe United States
Margareta Asp Sweden
Juh Hyun Shin South Korea
Tonya Roberts United States
Oddvar Førland Norway
Rose McCloskey relative to Joan Stanley United States Joan Stanley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Joan Stanley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rose McCloskey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rose McCloskey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rose McCloskey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rose McCloskey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rose McCloskey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rose McCloskey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rose McCloskey. The network helps show where Rose McCloskey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rose McCloskey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rose McCloskey Line = papers co-authored together Rose McCloskey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200447
2 201442
3 202141
4 201138
5 202032
6 202032
7 200730
8 202129
9 200829
10 200429
11 201528
12 201627
13 201522
14 201920
15 201217
16 201916
17 201815
18 202113
19 201112
20 201811

About Rose McCloskey

Rose McCloskey is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Demography, having authored 59 papers that have together received 621 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (29 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (8 papers), Nursing education and management (6 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (5 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (5 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (37 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (51 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (32 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (71 citations) and General Health Professions (359 citations). Rose McCloskey has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Connie Stewart, Pamela Jarrett, Lisa Keeping‐Burke, Doug Smith, Patricia Nicholson, Brian Veitch, Manal Kleib, Linda Slater, Linda Hansen and Lynn Nagle. Their work appears in journals such as JBI Evidence Synthesis, Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Qualitative Methods and Journal of research in nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact