Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Artificial intelligence (AI) library services innovative conceptual framework for the digital transformation of university education
2022145 citationsNorris Syed Abdullah, Rose Alinda Alias et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Rose Alinda Alias
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Rose Alinda Alias's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rose Alinda Alias with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rose Alinda Alias more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rose Alinda Alias
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rose Alinda Alias. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rose Alinda Alias. The network helps show where Rose Alinda Alias may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rose Alinda Alias
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rose Alinda Alias.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rose Alinda Alias based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rose Alinda Alias. Rose Alinda Alias is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Alias, Rose Alinda, et al.. (2019). Research Collaborator, how do i find thee?. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 108.1 indexed citations
4.
Alias, Rose Alinda, et al.. (2019). UNDERSTANDING CONSUMER’S ONLINE IMPULSE BUYING BEHAVIOR IN SOCIAL COMMERCE. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 102.1 indexed citations
5.
Panatik, Siti Aisyah, et al.. (2017). The Mediating Role of Web 2.0 Usage in the Effect of Psychological Empowerment on Innovative Work Behavior among Academia in Malaysian Research Universities. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. 251.2 indexed citations
6.
Panatik, Siti Aisyah, et al.. (2016). The effect of web 2.0 usage on innovative work behavior among academia in Malaysian research universities. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology. 93(2). 441–448.1 indexed citations
Alias, Rose Alinda, et al.. (2016). Facebook usage in promoting the academia expertise. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology. 89(1). 27–35.1 indexed citations
9.
Alias, Rose Alinda, et al.. (2016). Conceptualizing knowledge risk governance as a moderator to potentially reduce the risks in knowledge sharing. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 153.1 indexed citations
10.
Miskon, Suraya, et al.. (2015). BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ADOPTION THEORIES IN SMEs: A LITERATURE REVIEW. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 10(23). 18165–18174.18 indexed citations
11.
Alias, Rose Alinda, et al.. (2015). STAKEHOLDERS' VIEW ON MOOCS SUSTAINABILITY IN MALAYSIAN HIGHER EDUCATION: A PRELIMINARY STUDY. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 10(23). 18104–18112.5 indexed citations
12.
Alias, Rose Alinda, et al.. (2014). A conceptual formative framework of knowledge risk governance to enhance knowledge sharing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 270.2 indexed citations
13.
Hassan, Razali, et al.. (2012). Technical system interface design: An analysis on human cognitive model. 1. 82–87.2 indexed citations
14.
Mohd‐Yusof, Khairiyah, Fatin Aliah Phang, Syed Ahmad Helmi Syed Hassan, & Rose Alinda Alias. (2012). Collaborative Efforts in Developing the PhD in Engineering Education Program in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 1(1).
15.
Alias, Rose Alinda, et al.. (2011). Seeking Online Information Sources among Science Faculties of Developing Countries. Library philosophy and practice. 2011.7 indexed citations
16.
Rahim, Nor Zairah Ab., Rose Alinda Alias, & Jennie Carroll. (2010). Multiple Perspectives Technology Appropriation: Analysis of Open Source Software Implementation Failure. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1124–1135.4 indexed citations
17.
Ahmad, Mohammad Nazir, et al.. (2004). KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (KM) FRAMEWORK FOR REPRESENTING LESSONS LEARNED SYSTEM FOR COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE IN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science. 17(1). 1–12.7 indexed citations
18.
Abdullah, Rusli, et al.. (2003). Knowledge Management Framework for Higher Learning Institution in Collaborative Environment. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2003(1). 2–5.1 indexed citations
19.
Nurcahyo, Gunadi Widi, Rose Alinda Alias, Siti Mariyam Shamsuddin, & Mohd. Noor Md. Sap. (2002). Sweep Algorithm in Vehicle Routing Problem For Public Transport. 2(1).23 indexed citations
20.
Nurcahyo, Gunadi Widi, et al.. (2002). VEHICLE ROUTING PROBLEM FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORT: A CASE STUDY. ITC-CSCC :International Technical Conference on Circuits Systems, Computers and Communications. 1183–1186.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.