Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Investigating influence of green innovation on sustainability performance: A case on Malaysian hotel industry
2020402 citationsShahla Asadi, Rusli Abdullah et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Rusli Abdullah
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Rusli Abdullah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rusli Abdullah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rusli Abdullah more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rusli Abdullah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rusli Abdullah. The network helps show where Rusli Abdullah may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rusli Abdullah
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rusli Abdullah.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rusli Abdullah based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rusli Abdullah. Rusli Abdullah is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Atan, Rodziah, et al.. (2017). A 3D e-Commerce Applications Development Model: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Telecommunication Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC). 9. 27–33.1 indexed citations
11.
Abdullah, Rusli, et al.. (2017). Internet Banking Service Quality in Malaysia: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Telecommunication Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC). 9. 151–156.2 indexed citations
12.
Abdullah, Rusli, et al.. (2015). Preliminary study on semantic knowledge management model for collaborative learning. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 10(2). 442–450.7 indexed citations
Atan, Rodziah, et al.. (2013). E-LEARNING USER INTERFACE ACCEPTANCE BASED ON ANALYSIS OF USER'S STYLE, USABILITY AND USER BENEFITS. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
Abdullah, Rusli. (2012). Towards developing software testing as a service (staas) model in cloud computing: a case of collaborative knowledge management system. Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia). 25–29.1 indexed citations
17.
Abdullah, Rusli, Rodziah Atan, Razali Yaakob, Zuhaira Muhammad Zain, & Abdul Ghani. (2011). Blog quality measurement: Analysis of criteria using The Rasch Model.. Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia).4 indexed citations
Parizi, Reza M., Abdul Ghani, Rusli Abdullah, & Rodziah Atan. (2009). Towards a Framework for Automated Random Testing of Aspect-Oriented Programs.. 217–223.6 indexed citations
20.
Abdullah, Rusli, et al.. (2003). Knowledge Management Framework for Higher Learning Institution in Collaborative Environment. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2003(1). 2–5.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.