Rosalynd Southern

641 total citations
17 papers, 345 citations indexed

About

Rosalynd Southern is a scholar working on Communication, Gender Studies and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Rosalynd Southern has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 345 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Communication, 8 papers in Gender Studies and 7 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Rosalynd Southern's work include Social Media and Politics (13 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (6 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (5 papers). Rosalynd Southern is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (13 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (6 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (5 papers). Rosalynd Southern collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Rosalynd Southern's co-authors include Emily Harmer, Rachel Gibson, Pete Burnap, Matthew Williams, Luke Sloan, Benjamin Lee, Georgina Waylen, Zoë James, Patrícia Rossini and Jennifer Stromer‐Galley and has published in prestigious journals such as Information Communication & Society, Social Science Computer Review and Electoral Studies.

In The Last Decade

Rosalynd Southern

17 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rosalynd Southern United Kingdom 8 208 135 127 84 77 17 345
Jiyoun Suk United States 11 214 1.0× 206 1.5× 70 0.6× 67 0.8× 59 0.8× 32 360
Bethany Anne Conway United States 6 368 1.8× 226 1.7× 97 0.8× 43 0.5× 108 1.4× 9 470
Brenda Moon Australia 7 315 1.5× 192 1.4× 63 0.5× 37 0.4× 81 1.1× 14 416
Dennis Frieß Germany 6 293 1.4× 162 1.2× 123 1.0× 32 0.4× 92 1.2× 19 361
Tetyana Lokot Ireland 7 150 0.7× 205 1.5× 80 0.6× 47 0.6× 63 0.8× 18 329
Michael Bossetta Sweden 10 217 1.0× 198 1.5× 83 0.7× 21 0.3× 111 1.4× 23 366
Márton Bene Hungary 11 410 2.0× 229 1.7× 85 0.7× 46 0.5× 194 2.5× 39 538
Shuning Lu United States 9 220 1.1× 174 1.3× 105 0.8× 30 0.4× 23 0.3× 26 289
Haiko Lietz Germany 3 231 1.1× 159 1.2× 63 0.5× 27 0.3× 128 1.7× 5 348
Ines Engelmann Germany 8 230 1.1× 143 1.1× 64 0.5× 29 0.3× 37 0.5× 28 290

Countries citing papers authored by Rosalynd Southern

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rosalynd Southern's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosalynd Southern with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosalynd Southern more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rosalynd Southern

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosalynd Southern. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosalynd Southern. The network helps show where Rosalynd Southern may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rosalynd Southern

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rosalynd Southern. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rosalynd Southern based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rosalynd Southern. Rosalynd Southern is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Southern, Rosalynd. (2024). Does fear of harassment reduce women’s online political participation? Evidence from the British Election Study across three UK general elections. European Journal of Politics and Gender. 1–21. 3 indexed citations
2.
Gibson, Rachel, et al.. (2024). Does digital campaigning matter, and if so, how? Testing a broadcast versus network effects model of candidates Twitter use. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 22(3). 357–372. 1 indexed citations
3.
Rossini, Patrícia, Rosalynd Southern, Emily Harmer, & Jennifer Stromer‐Galley. (2023). Unleash Britain’s Potential (To Go Negative): Campaign Negativity in the 2017 and 2019 UK General Elections on Facebook. Political Studies Review. 22(3). 449–470. 7 indexed citations
4.
Harmer, Emily & Rosalynd Southern. (2021). Digital microaggressions and everyday othering: an analysis of tweets sent to women members of Parliament in the UK. Information Communication & Society. 24(14). 1998–2015. 21 indexed citations
5.
Southern, Rosalynd, et al.. (2021). #NoSnowflakes: The toleration of harassment and an emergent gender-related digital divide, in a UK student online culture. Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 27(5). 1418–1438. 14 indexed citations
6.
Southern, Rosalynd, et al.. (2020). By any memes necessary? Small political acts, incidental exposure and memes during the 2017 UK general election. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 23(1). 60–84. 29 indexed citations
7.
Harmer, Emily & Rosalynd Southern. (2020). ‘Girly Swots’ and the Most Diverse Parliament Ever: Women’s Representation, Voters and Issues in the 2019 Election Campaign. Parliamentary Affairs. 73(Supplement_1). 243–258. 2 indexed citations
8.
Harmer, Emily & Rosalynd Southern. (2020). Is Digital News Really that Digital? An Analysis of How Online News Sites in the UK use Digital Affordances to Enhance Their Reporting. Journalism Studies. 21(16). 2234–2248. 9 indexed citations
9.
Ward, Stephen J. A., et al.. (2019). A tale of three tribes: UK MPs, Twitter and the EU Referendum campaign1. Information Polity. 25(1). 49–66. 2 indexed citations
10.
Southern, Rosalynd & Emily Harmer. (2019). Twitter, Incivility and “Everyday” Gendered Othering: An Analysis of Tweets Sent to UK Members of Parliament. Social Science Computer Review. 39(2). 259–275. 69 indexed citations
11.
Waylen, Georgina & Rosalynd Southern. (2019). When Are Women as Corrupt as Men? Gender, Corruption, and Accountability in the UK Parliamentary Expenses Scandal. Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society. 28(1). 119–142. 7 indexed citations
12.
Southern, Rosalynd & Benjamin Lee. (2018). Politics as usual? Assessing the extent and content of candidate-level online campaigning at the 2015 UK general election. Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties. 29(2). 179–198. 12 indexed citations
13.
Harmer, Emily & Rosalynd Southern. (2017). More Stable than Strong: Women’s Representation, Voters and Issues. Parliamentary Affairs. 71(suppl_1). 237–254. 4 indexed citations
14.
Southern, Rosalynd & Kingsley Purdam. (2016). The changing representation interface: democracy and direct contact with politicians. Journal of Civil Society. 12(1). 101–120. 2 indexed citations
15.
Burnap, Pete, Rachel Gibson, Luke Sloan, Rosalynd Southern, & Matthew Williams. (2015). 140 characters to victory?: Using Twitter to predict the UK 2015 General Election. Electoral Studies. 41. 230–233. 129 indexed citations
16.
Southern, Rosalynd. (2014). Is Web 2.0 Providing a Voice for Outsiders? A Comparison of Personal Web Site and Social Media Use by Candidates at the 2010 UK General Election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 12(1). 1–17. 31 indexed citations
17.
James, Zoë & Rosalynd Southern. (2006). Devon-wide Gypsy and Traveller Housing Needs Assessment. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jiyoun Suk Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bethany Anne Conway Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Brenda Moon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dennis Frieß Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tetyana Lokot Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michael Bossetta Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Márton Bene Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shuning Lu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Haiko Lietz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ines Engelmann
Rankless by CCL
2026