Bethany Anne Conway

729 total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 470 citations indexed

About

Bethany Anne Conway is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Bethany Anne Conway has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 470 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Communication, 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Bethany Anne Conway's work include Social Media and Politics (7 papers), Media Studies and Communication (5 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers). Bethany Anne Conway is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (7 papers), Media Studies and Communication (5 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers). Bethany Anne Conway collaborates with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Bethany Anne Conway's co-authors include Kate Kenski, Di Wang, Robin Stryker, Di Wang, Shawn Bauldry, Eric Tsetsi and Yotam Shmargad and has published in prestigious journals such as Communication Research, American Behavioral Scientist and Human Communication Research.

In The Last Decade

Bethany Anne Conway

8 papers receiving 436 citations

Hit Papers

The Rise of Twitter in the Political Campaign: Searching ... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bethany Anne Conway United States 6 368 226 108 97 51 9 470
Brenda Moon Australia 7 315 0.9× 192 0.8× 81 0.8× 63 0.6× 59 1.2× 14 416
Bente Kalsnes Norway 12 484 1.3× 286 1.3× 148 1.4× 109 1.1× 37 0.7× 26 642
Márton Bene Hungary 11 410 1.1× 229 1.0× 194 1.8× 85 0.9× 24 0.5× 39 538
John H. Parmelee United States 10 549 1.5× 312 1.4× 125 1.2× 66 0.7× 81 1.6× 22 691
Michael Bossetta Sweden 10 217 0.6× 198 0.9× 111 1.0× 83 0.9× 25 0.5× 23 366
Joyce Y. M. Nip Australia 8 375 1.0× 203 0.9× 63 0.6× 33 0.3× 42 0.8× 15 491
Kim Strandberg Finland 16 577 1.6× 278 1.2× 304 2.8× 125 1.3× 54 1.1× 44 723
Melanie Magin Norway 11 374 1.0× 236 1.0× 144 1.3× 72 0.7× 18 0.4× 44 524
Nicolas Hubé France 7 451 1.2× 440 1.9× 179 1.7× 102 1.1× 32 0.6× 35 658
Víctor García‐Perdomo Colombia 10 428 1.2× 302 1.3× 56 0.5× 43 0.4× 30 0.6× 27 591

Countries citing papers authored by Bethany Anne Conway

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bethany Anne Conway's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bethany Anne Conway with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bethany Anne Conway more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bethany Anne Conway

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bethany Anne Conway. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bethany Anne Conway. The network helps show where Bethany Anne Conway may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bethany Anne Conway

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bethany Anne Conway. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bethany Anne Conway based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bethany Anne Conway. Bethany Anne Conway is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Stryker, Robin, et al.. (2024). Emotional Markers of Disrespect: A Fourth Dimension of Perceived Political Incivility?. Communication Research. 51(5). 496–524. 2 indexed citations
2.
Conway, Bethany Anne, Eric Tsetsi, Kate Kenski, & Yotam Shmargad. (2022). Tipping the Twitter vs. News Media Scale? Conducting a Third Assessment of Intermedia Agenda-Setting Effects during the Presidential Nomination Season. Journal of Political Marketing. 21(3-4). 247–258. 1 indexed citations
3.
Conway, Bethany Anne, et al.. (2022). Twitter and the Faces of Whiteness: Investigating Official Responses to the Death of George Floyd. Howard Journal of Communications. 34(2). 188–207.
4.
Stryker, Robin, et al.. (2021). Replication Note: What is Political Incivility?. Human Communication Research. 48(1). 168–177. 9 indexed citations
5.
Conway, Bethany Anne. (2021). “Sources and Journalists” Revisited: Proposing an Interdependent Approach to Source Use. Journalism Practice. 16(8). 1614–1634. 5 indexed citations
6.
Conway, Bethany Anne & Robin Stryker. (2021). Does a Speaker’s (In)formal Role in News Media Shape Perceptions of Political Incivility?. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 65(1). 24–45. 5 indexed citations
7.
Stryker, Robin, et al.. (2016). What is political incivility?. Communication Monographs. 83(4). 535–556. 108 indexed citations
8.
Conway, Bethany Anne, Kate Kenski, & Di Wang. (2015). The Rise of Twitter in the Political Campaign: Searching for Intermedia Agenda-Setting Effects in the Presidential Primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 20(4). 363–380. 246 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Conway, Bethany Anne, Kate Kenski, & Di Wang. (2013). Twitter Use by Presidential Primary Candidates During the 2012 Campaign. American Behavioral Scientist. 57(11). 1596–1610. 94 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026