Rosa M. Santos
- Surgery top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Luı́s M. RosárioMiguel ValdeolmillosBernat SoriaÃngel NadalJavier García‐SanchoAmélia M. SilvaÂngelo R. ToméDiego Contreras
- Topics
- Pancreatic function and diabetes (21 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (13 papers)Ion channel regulation and function (10 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological ChemistrySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Journal of Physiology
- Partner nations
- PortugalUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Rosa M. Santos
39 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Surgery 781
- Molecular Biology 679
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 291
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 285
- Genetics 195
Countries citing papers authored by Rosa M. Santos
This map shows the geographic impact of Rosa M. Santos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosa M. Santos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosa M. Santos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rosa M. Santos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosa M. Santos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosa M. Santos. The network helps show where Rosa M. Santos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rosa M. Santos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rosa M. Santos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rosa M. Santos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rosa M. Santos. Rosa M. Santos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 97 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 307 | |
| 19 | 176 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About Rosa M. Santos
Rosa M. Santos is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (21 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (13 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (119 citations), Surgery (781 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (291 citations). Rosa M. Santos has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Luı́s M. Rosário, Miguel Valdeolmillos, Bernat Soria, Ãngel Nadal, Javier García‐Sancho, Amélia M. Silva, Ângelo R. Tomé, Diego Contreras, Rui M. Barbosa and Célia M. Antunes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The Journal of Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.