Catherine Osborne
- Philosophy top 2%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Archeology top 5%
- Religious studies top 10%
- Classics
- Topics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought (17 papers)Classical Antiquity Studies (6 papers)Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (6 papers)
- Cited by
- PhilosophyAnthropologyArcheology
- Journals
- The Philosophical ReviewThe Computer JournalStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Catherine Osborne
24 papers receiving 116 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Philosophy 109
- Anthropology 65
- Archeology 58
- Religious studies 14
- Classics 12
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Osborne
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Osborne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Osborne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Osborne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Osborne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Osborne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Osborne. The network helps show where Catherine Osborne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine Osborne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine Osborne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine Osborne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine Osborne. Catherine Osborne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | American Catholics and the art of the future, 1930--1975 | 1 |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | Presocratic Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction | 8 |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | Topography in the Timaeus | 1 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Love's bitter fruits: Martha C. Nussbaum The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics | 4 |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | A 'Philosophy of Teaching Scale' for Use with Elementary School Teachers. | 0 |
| 20 | 4 |
About Catherine Osborne
Catherine Osborne is a scholar working on Philosophy, General Psychology and Archeology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 166 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (17 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (6 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (109 citations), Anthropology (65 citations) and Archeology (58 citations). Catherine Osborne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. C. M. van Winden, David J. Furley and Thomas M. Robinson. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Computer Journal and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.