Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Ronald Meester
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ronald Meester's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ronald Meester with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ronald Meester more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ronald Meester. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ronald Meester. The network helps show where Ronald Meester may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ronald Meester
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ronald Meester.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ronald Meester based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ronald Meester. Ronald Meester is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Meester, Ronald, et al.. (2017). Bayesiaanse analyses van complexe strafzaken door deskundigen. Betrouwbaar en zo ja: nuttig?. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University).1 indexed citations
Meester, Ronald, et al.. (2015). Critical densities in sandpile models with quenched or annealed disorder. VU Research Portal. 21(1). 57–83.1 indexed citations
Meester, Ronald, et al.. (2014). Het gebruik van schakelbewijs; juridische en kans-theoretische gezichtspunten. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 2014(5). 153–167.1 indexed citations
Camia, Federico, et al.. (2008). Geometric properties of two-dimensional near-critical percolation. arXiv (Cornell University).2 indexed citations
10.
Meester, Ronald & Marjan Sjerps. (2008). Why the Effect of Prior Odds Should Accompany the Likelihood Ratio When Reporting DNA Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
11.
Meester, Ronald, et al.. (2007). Stabilizability and percolation in the infinite volume sandpile model. Report Eurandom. 2007053.1 indexed citations
Meester, Ronald, et al.. (2006). Bounds for avalanche critical values of the Bak-Sneppen model. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 12(4). 679–694.2 indexed citations
16.
Meester, Ronald, et al.. (2005). Connections between 'self-organised' and 'classical' criticality. VU Research Portal. 11(2). 355–370.10 indexed citations
17.
Franceschetti, Massimo, et al.. (2003). Percolation in multi-hop wireless networks.12 indexed citations
18.
Meester, Ronald, et al.. (2000). On a long range particle system with unbounded flip rates. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 9(1). 59–84.1 indexed citations
19.
Berg, J. van den, et al.. (1997). Dynamic Boolean models. Stochastic Processes and their Applications. 69(2). 247–257.29 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.