John C. Wierman
- Mathematical Physics top 1%
- Statistics and Probability top 1%
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 2%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 5%
- Co-authors
- R. T. SmytheDavid J. MarchetteTomasz ŁuczakBoris PittelEdward R. ScheinermanRobert M. ZiffKrzysztof NowickiLawrence Gray
- Topics
- Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (61 papers)Theoretical and Computational Physics (45 papers)Random Matrices and Applications (23 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Molecular BiologyAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesLecture notes in mathematics
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenPoland
In The Last Decade
John C. Wierman
79 papers receiving 982 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Mathematical Physics 660
- Statistics and Probability 443
- Condensed Matter Physics 439
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 245
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 137
Countries citing papers authored by John C. Wierman
This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Wierman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Wierman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Wierman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Wierman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Wierman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Wierman. The network helps show where John C. Wierman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John C. Wierman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John C. Wierman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John C. Wierman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John C. Wierman. John C. Wierman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | Triangle-duality and equality of infinitely many bond percolation thresholds | 1 |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 72 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 39 |
About John C. Wierman
John C. Wierman is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Statistics and Probability and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (61 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (45 papers) and Random Matrices and Applications (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (660 citations), Statistics and Probability (443 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (439 citations). John C. Wierman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Poland. Frequent co-authors include R. T. Smythe, David J. Marchette, Tomasz Łuczak, Boris Pittel, Edward R. Scheinerman, Robert M. Ziff, Krzysztof Nowicki, Lawrence Gray, Christian R. Scullard and Carey E. Priebe. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Molecular Biology, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Lecture notes in mathematics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.