Ronald E. Walker

42 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers

Ronald E. Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • General Psychology 11
  • Applied Psychology 42
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 105
  • Social Psychology 163
  • Family Practice 15
Replace Melvin Feffer with:
Melvin Feffer United States
Philip Himelstein United States
Noah S. Glassman United States
David Kalmar United States
James C. Mancuso United States
Ernst G. Beier United States
James C. Diggory United States
Leonore R. Love United States
Alden E. Wessman United States
Lucy Rau United States
Ronald E. Walker relative to Melvin Feffer United States Melvin Feffer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Melvin Feffer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ronald E. Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ronald E. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ronald E. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ronald E. Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ronald E. Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ronald E. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ronald E. Walker. The network helps show where Ronald E. Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ronald E. Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ronald E. Walker Line = papers co-authored together Ronald E. Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197398
2 196533
3 197126
4 196424
5 198322
6 197720
7 196515
8 196913
9 196213
10 199910
11 196610
12 197010
13 19729
14 19728
15 19667
16 19637
17 19706
18 19656
19 19666
20 19606

About Ronald E. Walker

Ronald E. Walker is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Education, having authored 46 papers that have together received 412 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (3 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (3 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (11 citations), Applied Psychology (42 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (105 citations), Social Psychology (163 citations) and Family Practice (15 citations). Ronald E. Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jeanne M. Foley, William A. Hunt, Janet T. Spence, Charles R. Stearns, Robert G. Riedel, Eugene Kennedy, James E. Keen, Heather M. Davey, Gary P. Rupp and Edward P. Sheridan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Psychology, Psychology in the Schools, Journal of Community Psychology, Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact