Romina Pena

417 total citations
11 papers, 217 citations indexed

About

Romina Pena is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Romina Pena has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 217 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Surgery, 5 papers in Oncology and 2 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Romina Pena's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (3 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers). Romina Pena is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (3 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers). Romina Pena collaborates with scholars based in Spain, Venezuela and Austria. Romina Pena's co-authors include F. Borja de Lacy, R. Bravo, José M. Balibrea, Ana Otero Piñeiro, Antonio M. Lacy, Antonio M. Lacy, Francisco B. de Lacy, Míriam Cuatrecasas, Renata Sánchez and Raquel Gómez Bravo and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and British journal of surgery.

In The Last Decade

Romina Pena

9 papers receiving 210 citations

Peers

Romina Pena

SURGE

ONCOL

BE

PHEOH

CVPR

F. Borja de Lacy Spain

Omaira Rodríguez Venezuela

Yen‐Yi Juo United States

Babak Namazi United States

Ludovica Guerriero Italy

Alfonso Lapergola France

Samuel P. Shih United States

D. Hashimoto United States

Deepak Rajput India

Jenifer Barrie United Kingdom

F. Borja de Lacy Spain

Romina Pena

240 ×1.5

SURGE

214 ×3.0

ONCOL

47 ×0.8

BE

24 ×0.9

PHEOH

15 ×0.6

CVPR

Citations per year, relative to Romina Pena Romina Pena (= 1×) peers F. Borja de Lacy

Countries citing papers authored by Romina Pena

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Romina Pena's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Romina Pena with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Romina Pena more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Romina Pena

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Romina Pena. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Romina Pena. The network helps show where Romina Pena may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Romina Pena

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Romina Pena. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Romina Pena based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Romina Pena. Romina Pena is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Pera, Miguél, et al.. (2025). Education and training on transanal minimally invasive surgery and transanal total mesorectal excision: a narrative review. Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery. 10. 14–14.

2.

Pena, Romina, et al.. (2024). Efficacy of injection of autologous adipose tissue in the treatment of patients with complex and recurrent fistula-in-ano of cryptoglandular origin. Techniques in Coloproctology. 28(1). 81–81. 3 indexed citations

3.

Lacy, F. Borja de, Pilar Taurá, José Ríos, et al.. (2019). Impact of pneumoperitoneum on intra-abdominal microcirculation blood flow: an experimental randomized controlled study of two insufflator models during transanal total mesorectal excision. Surgical Endoscopy. 34(10). 4494–4503. 7 indexed citations

4.

Rosenblatt, Eduardo, Glenn Jones, Reena Engineer, et al.. (2019). Short-Course Radiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: An IAEA Randomized Trial. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 105(1). S107–S107. 1 indexed citations

5.

Lacy, Antonio M., R. Bravo, Ana Otero Piñeiro, et al.. (2019). 5G-assisted telementored surgery. British journal of surgery. 106(12). 1576–1579. 87 indexed citations

6.

Ferrer, Joana, Carlos Martínez, Beatriz Revilla‐Nuin, et al.. (2018). Role of Kupffer cells in the progression of CRC liver metastases after the first stage of ALPPS. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 8089–8089. 7 indexed citations

7.

Lacy, Francisco B. de, et al.. (2017). Transanal total mesorectal excision: pathological results of 186 patients with mid and low rectal cancer. Surgical Endoscopy. 32(5). 2442–2447. 57 indexed citations

8.

Pena, Romina, et al.. (2015). Phytobezoar Causing Intestinal Obstruction in a Patient With a Prior Right Colectomy. Cirugía Española (English Edition). 93(5). e29–e29.

9.

Rodríguez, Omaira, et al.. (2014). Laparoscopic Surgery Skills Evaluation: Analysis Based on Accelerometers. JSLS Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons. 18(4). e2014.00234–e2014.00234. 26 indexed citations

10.

Rodríguez, Omaira, et al.. (2013). Construct Validity of an Inanimate Training Model for Laparoscopic Appendectomy. JSLS Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons. 17(3). 445–449. 10 indexed citations

11.

Rodríguez, Omaira, et al.. (2011). Robotic-assisted Heller myotomy versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: a case–control study. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 6(3). 213–216. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact