G. Bueß
- Surgery top 10%
- Oncology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Biomedical Engineering
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Topics
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (7 papers)Esophageal and GI Pathology (5 papers)Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers)
- Cited by
- SurgeryOncologyGastroenterology
- Journals
- CancerSurgical EndoscopyEndoscopy
In The Last Decade
G. Bueß
17 papers receiving 339 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Surgery 292
- Oncology 174
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 96
- Biomedical Engineering 66
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 19
Countries citing papers authored by G. Bueß
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Bueß's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Bueß with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Bueß more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Bueß
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Bueß. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Bueß. The network helps show where G. Bueß may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Bueß
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Bueß. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Bueß based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Bueß. G. Bueß is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 73 | |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | [First results of transanal endoscopic surgery (sec. Buess) in Hungary]. | 1 |
| 4 | Intelligent surgical instrument system ISIS. Concept and preliminary experimental application of components and prototypes. | 46 |
| 5 | [Intraoperative cardiopulmonary disorders during esophagectomy in relation to the surgical technique]. | 1 |
| 6 | Experimental development in colorectal surgery. | 4 |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | [Transanal endoscopic microsurgery of the small rectal cancer]. | 3 |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | [Conservative treatment of peptic esophageal stenoses with endoscopic bougienage--an effective and safe procedure]. | 1 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | [Endotube as a palliative measure in stenosing cancer of the esophagus and cardia]. | 1 |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | [Endoscopic microsurgery in broad-base rectal adenoma]. | 3 |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | [Transanal endoscopic surgery of the rectum - testing a new method in animal experiments]. | 149 |
| 17 | [Transanal application of a decompressive intestinal tube in the surgical treatment of a small intestine ileus. An alternative to enterostomy]. | 1 |
About G. Bueß
G. Bueß is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Surgery and Oncology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (7 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (5 papers) and Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (292 citations), Oncology (174 citations) and Gastroenterology (19 citations). G. Bueß has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Ferenc Hutterer, W. Isselhard, R Theiss, S Said, H. Pichlmaier, Andreas Melzer, M. O. Schurr, W Kunert, D. W. Meijer and Marco Maria Lirici. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, Surgical Endoscopy and Endoscopy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.