Rollie E. Poppino
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Anthropology top 10%
- Development top 10%
- Co-authors
- Thomas E. SkidmoreAlfred StepanRobert J. AlexanderThomas C. BruneauPeter McDonoughPhilippe FaucherDonald E. WorcesterBailey W. Diffie
- Topics
- History of Colonial Brazil (7 papers)Brazilian cultural history and politics (6 papers)Sociology and Education in Brazil (5 papers)
- Cited by
- DevelopmentAnthropologyUrban Studies
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Rollie E. Poppino
30 papers receiving 164 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Sociology and Political Science 115
- Political Science and International Relations 67
- Economics and Econometrics 38
- Anthropology 37
- Development 24
Countries citing papers authored by Rollie E. Poppino
This map shows the geographic impact of Rollie E. Poppino's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rollie E. Poppino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rollie E. Poppino more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rollie E. Poppino
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rollie E. Poppino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rollie E. Poppino. The network helps show where Rollie E. Poppino may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rollie E. Poppino
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rollie E. Poppino. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rollie E. Poppino based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rollie E. Poppino. Rollie E. Poppino is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | Brazil: the land and people | 11 |
| 12 | International communism in Latin America | 2 |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Rollie E. Poppino
Rollie E. Poppino is a scholar working on Anthropology, History and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 42 papers that have together received 238 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Colonial Brazil (7 papers), Brazilian cultural history and politics (6 papers) and Sociology and Education in Brazil (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (24 citations), Anthropology (37 citations) and Urban Studies (17 citations). Rollie E. Poppino has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas E. Skidmore, Alfred Stepan, Robert J. Alexander, Thomas C. Bruneau, Peter McDonough, Philippe Faucher, Donald E. Worcester, Bailey W. Diffie, Robert M. Levine and John W. F. Dulles. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Language Journal, The American Historical Review and Technology and Culture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.