Rolando Dias
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Polymers and Plastics top 10%
- Analytical Chemistry top 5%
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Mário Rui P. F. N. CostaReinaldo GiudiciLeandro G. AguiarCl. Buess-HermanL. GierstValentina FrancoMaria Filomena BarreiroCláudia Martins
- Topics
- Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (28 papers)Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (12 papers)Analytical chemistry methods development (9 papers)
- Journals
- MacromoleculesPolymerMolecules
In The Last Decade
Rolando Dias
50 papers receiving 615 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Organic Chemistry 399
- Polymers and Plastics 176
- Analytical Chemistry 119
- Spectroscopy 96
- Biomedical Engineering 83
Countries citing papers authored by Rolando Dias
This map shows the geographic impact of Rolando Dias's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rolando Dias with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rolando Dias more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rolando Dias
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rolando Dias. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rolando Dias. The network helps show where Rolando Dias may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rolando Dias
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rolando Dias. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rolando Dias based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rolando Dias. Rolando Dias is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | Polymer reaction engineering studies on smart hydrogels formation | 1 |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | The combined use of orthogonal Laguerre expansions and numerical evaluation of generating functions for computing polymer chain-lenght distributions | 1 |
| 20 | 18 |
About Rolando Dias
Rolando Dias is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Polymers and Plastics, having authored 53 papers that have together received 621 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (28 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (12 papers) and Analytical chemistry methods development (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (74 citations), Organic Chemistry (399 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (176 citations). Rolando Dias has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Mexico and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Mário Rui P. F. N. Costa, Reinaldo Giudici, Leandro G. Aguiar, Cl. Buess-Herman, L. Gierst, Valentina Franco, Maria Filomena Barreiro, Cláudia Martins, Hugo Costa and Ana Queiroz. Their work appears in journals such as Macromolecules, Polymer and Molecules.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.