Roger D. Santer

1.2k total citations
37 papers, 827 citations indexed

About

Roger D. Santer is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Roger D. Santer has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 827 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 17 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Roger D. Santer's work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (18 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (12 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers). Roger D. Santer is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (18 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (12 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers). Roger D. Santer collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Roger D. Santer's co-authors include F. Claire Rind, Peter Simmons, Eileen A. Hebets, Richard Stafford, Yoshifumi Yamawaki, Geraldine A. Wright, Aaron Rundus, Gareth Griffith, Amy Cooper and William L. Allen and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Neurophysiology and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Roger D. Santer

35 papers receiving 815 citations

Peers

Roger D. Santer

CMN

EEBS

GENET

Robert M. Olberg United States

Karl Kral Austria

Michael Mangan United Kingdom

Tom Matheson United Kingdom

Samuel Rossel Germany

Martin M. Müller Germany

Paloma T. Gonzalez-Bellido United States

Norbert Elsner Germany

Alice A. Robie United States

Norbert Boeddeker Germany

Robert M. Olberg United States

Roger D. Santer

592 ×1.5

CMN

346 ×1.0

EEBS

286 ×1.1

257 ×1.2

GENET

94 ×1.0

Citations per year, relative to Roger D. Santer Roger D. Santer (= 1×) peers Robert M. Olberg

Countries citing papers authored by Roger D. Santer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roger D. Santer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger D. Santer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger D. Santer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roger D. Santer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger D. Santer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger D. Santer. The network helps show where Roger D. Santer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roger D. Santer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roger D. Santer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roger D. Santer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roger D. Santer. Roger D. Santer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Santer, Roger D., et al.. (2025). Microbial pathogens of edible insects: a growing problem for the insect farming industry. Emerging Topics in Life Sciences. 9(1). 23–34.

Santer, Roger D. & Otar Akanyeti. (2025). Using artificial neural networks to explain the attraction of jewel beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) to colored traps. Insect Science. 33(1). 325–335. 1 indexed citations

Santer, Roger D. & William Allen. (2025). Insect visual perception and pest control: opportunities and challenges. Current Opinion in Insect Science. 68. 101331–101331. 4 indexed citations

Santer, Roger D. & William L. Allen. (2023). Optimising the colour of traps requires an insect's eye view. Pest Management Science. 80(3). 931–934. 9 indexed citations

Santer, Roger D., Otar Akanyeti, John A. Endler, Ismael Galván, & Michael N. Okal. (2023). Why are biting flies attracted to blue objects?. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 290(2001). 20230463–20230463. 5 indexed citations

Adams, Matt, Kasey D. Fowler‐Finn, Malcolm F. Rosenthal, et al.. (2022). Increased signal complexity is associated with increased mating success. Biology Letters. 18(5). 20220052–20220052. 18 indexed citations

Santer, Roger D., Michael N. Okal, Johan Esterhuizen, & Stephen J. Torr. (2021). Evaluation of improved coloured targets to control riverine tsetse in East Africa: A Bayesian approach. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 15(6). e0009463–e0009463. 6 indexed citations

Jones, R., et al.. (2018). Dose-dependent behavioural fever responses in desert locusts challenged with the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium acridum. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 14222–14222. 19 indexed citations

Santer, Roger D.. (2017). Developing photoreceptor-based models of visual attraction in riverine tsetse, for use in the engineering of more-attractive polyester fabrics for control devices. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 11(3). e0005448–e0005448. 8 indexed citations

10.

Cooper, Amy, et al.. (2017). Increased Male-Male Mounting Behaviour in Desert Locusts during Infection with an Entomopathogenic Fungus. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 5659–5659. 9 indexed citations

11.

Santer, Roger D.. (2014). A Colour Opponent Model That Explains Tsetse Fly Attraction to Visual Baits and Can Be Used to Investigate More Efficacious Bait Materials. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 8(12). e3360–e3360. 14 indexed citations

12.

Santer, Roger D. & Eileen A. Hebets. (2011). Evidence for Air Movement Signals in the Agonistic Behaviour of a Nocturnal Arachnid (Order Amblypygi). PLoS ONE. 6(8). e22473–e22473. 15 indexed citations

13.

Simmons, Peter, F. Claire Rind, & Roger D. Santer. (2010). Escapes with and without preparation: The neuroethology of visual startle in locusts. Journal of Insect Physiology. 56(8). 876–883. 53 indexed citations

14.

Santer, Roger D. & Eileen A. Hebets. (2009). Tactile learning by a whip spider, Phrynus marginemaculatus C.L. Koch (Arachnida, Amblypygi). Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 195(4). 393–399. 35 indexed citations

15.

Rind, F. Claire, Roger D. Santer, & Geraldine A. Wright. (2008). Arousal Facilitates Collision Avoidance Mediated by a Looming Sensitive Visual Neuron in a Flying Locust. Journal of Neurophysiology. 100(2). 670–680. 54 indexed citations

16.

Santer, Roger D., Yoshifumi Yamawaki, F. Claire Rind, & Peter Simmons. (2007). Preparing for escape: an examination of the role of the DCMD neuron in locust escape jumps. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 194(1). 69–77. 45 indexed citations

17.

Santer, Roger D., Yoshifumi Yamawaki, F. Claire Rind, & Peter Simmons. (2005). Motor activity and trajectory control during escape jumping in the locust Locusta migratoria. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 191(10). 965–975. 74 indexed citations

18.

Rind, F. Claire & Roger D. Santer. (2004). Collision avoidance and a looming sensitive neuron: size matters but biggest is not necessarily best. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 271(suppl_3). S27–9. 23 indexed citations

19.

Santer, Roger D., Peter Simmons, & F. Claire Rind. (2004). Gliding behaviour elicited by lateral looming stimuli in flying locusts. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 191(1). 61–73. 82 indexed citations

20.

Santer, Roger D. & Kathryn Phillips. (2002). Waste Disposal, Crab Style. Journal of Experimental Biology. 205(18). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact