Roger D. Santer
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Genetics top 10%
- Insect Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- F. Claire RindPeter SimmonsEileen A. HebetsRichard StaffordYoshifumi YamawakiGeraldine A. WrightAaron RundusGareth Griffith
- Topics
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (18 papers)Animal Behavior and Reproduction (12 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers)
- Cited by
- Cellular and Molecular NeuroscienceEcology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsCognitive Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Roger D. Santer
35 papers receiving 815 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 384
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 331
- Cognitive Neuroscience 250
- Genetics 212
- Insect Science 96
Countries citing papers authored by Roger D. Santer
This map shows the geographic impact of Roger D. Santer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger D. Santer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger D. Santer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roger D. Santer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger D. Santer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger D. Santer. The network helps show where Roger D. Santer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roger D. Santer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roger D. Santer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roger D. Santer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roger D. Santer. Roger D. Santer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 53 | |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | 54 | |
| 16 | 45 | |
| 17 | 74 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 82 | |
| 20 | Waste Disposal, Crab Style | 1 |
About Roger D. Santer
Roger D. Santer is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 827 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (18 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (12 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (384 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (331 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (250 citations). Roger D. Santer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include F. Claire Rind, Peter Simmons, Eileen A. Hebets, Richard Stafford, Yoshifumi Yamawaki, Geraldine A. Wright, Aaron Rundus, Gareth Griffith, Amy Cooper and William L. Allen. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Neurophysiology and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.