Michael N. Okal
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Plant Science
- Insect Science top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Co-authors
- Ulrike FillingerSteve W. LindsayManuela Herrera-VarelaJenny M. LindhDaniel MasigaK. OkadaJun‐ya UedaKensuke Miyamoto
- Topics
- Mosquito-borne diseases and control (8 papers)Insect Pest Control Strategies (6 papers)Trypanosoma species research and implications (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- KenyaUnited KingdomSweden
In The Last Decade
Michael N. Okal
20 papers receiving 281 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 145
- Plant Science 123
- Insect Science 76
- Molecular Biology 45
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 45
Countries citing papers authored by Michael N. Okal
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael N. Okal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael N. Okal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael N. Okal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael N. Okal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael N. Okal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael N. Okal. The network helps show where Michael N. Okal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael N. Okal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael N. Okal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael N. Okal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael N. Okal. Michael N. Okal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 52 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 39 | |
| 20 | 41 |
About Michael N. Okal
Michael N. Okal is a scholar working on Insect Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 20 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mosquito-borne diseases and control (8 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (6 papers) and Trypanosoma species research and implications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (76 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (145 citations) and Parasitology (28 citations). Michael N. Okal has collaborated with scholars based in Kenya, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Ulrike Fillinger, Steve W. Lindsay, Manuela Herrera-Varela, Jenny M. Lindh, Daniel Masiga, K. Okada, Jun‐ya Ueda, Kensuke Miyamoto, Anna‐Karin Borg‐Karlson and Baldwyn Torto. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Plant and Cell Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.