Diana E. Bowler
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 0.1%
- Ecology top 0.5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 0.5%
- Environmental Engineering top 0.2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Andrew S. PullinTeri KnightTim G. BentonJonathan M. ChaseRoel van KlinkKonstantin B. GongalskyAnn B. SwengelKatrin Böhning‐Gaese
- Topics
- Species Distribution and Climate Change (42 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (32 papers)Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Diana E. Bowler
70 papers receiving 8.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 3.1k
- Ecology 2.5k
- Global and Planetary Change 2.3k
- Environmental Engineering 1.9k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.8k
Countries citing papers authored by Diana E. Bowler
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana E. Bowler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana E. Bowler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana E. Bowler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana E. Bowler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana E. Bowler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana E. Bowler. The network helps show where Diana E. Bowler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana E. Bowler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana E. Bowler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana E. Bowler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana E. Bowler. Diana E. Bowler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 39 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | 70 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | The evidence base for community forest management as a mechanism for supplying gloval environmental benefits and improving local welfare | 31 |
About Diana E. Bowler
Diana E. Bowler is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, having authored 76 papers that have together received 8.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (42 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (32 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (1.2k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (3.1k citations) and Environmental Engineering (1.9k citations). Diana E. Bowler has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew S. Pullin, Teri Knight, Tim G. Benton, Jonathan M. Chase, Roel van Klink, Konstantin B. Gongalsky, Ann B. Swengel, Katrin Böhning‐Gaese, Anthony David Fox and Henning Heldbjerg. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.